MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253971444 · doi:10.1002/celc.201901175

Organic Electrosynthesis

2019· article· en· W4253971444 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueChemElectroChem · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectrosynthesisNanotechnologyVariety (cybernetics)ChemistryEngineering ethicsComputer scienceEngineeringElectrochemistryMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Organic electrosynthesis: Electrosynthesis is naturally a huge topic within the field of electrochemistry. Although it has an extensive history, it has recently seen a new era of growth and is now largely considered its own field rather than simply a subdiscipline. This Special Issue highlights the latest research in this exciting field. Since Kolbe′s pioneering work in the middle of the nineteenth century,1 electrosynthesis has become known as a useful tool to achieve a variety of organic transformations.2 With countless applications on a laboratory scale and some industrial processes, it can be considered a versatile and mature discipline. Spurred on by the establishment of the adiponitrile process by Manuel Baizer in the 1960s (the most successful electroorganic process to date),3 the field experienced a peak phase through the 1970s and 1980s, but then gradually fell out of the focus of academic researchers. One reason for this is certainly the failure to sustainably integrate electrosynthesis into university teaching. Today it is, therefore, not surprising that, for most chemists, the term “electrochemistry” is associated with their experience from courses in physical and analytical chemistry. Simultaneously, electrosynthesis has not yet made its way into organic chemistry textbooks and has thereby failed to become an integral part of the repertoire of preparative chemists. As a consequence, for many years it was practiced and appreciated by a rather small scientific community. Very recently, the methodology has experienced a resurrection, which is, in part, driven by the increasing importance of intermittent renewable energy sources and the idea of using local and temporary excesses of electric energy for the production of value-added chemicals. A second driving force behind this renaissance is the ongoing quest for new sustainable synthetic methods. What can be more promising, for example, than avoiding reagent waste by using “clean” electricity? However, the sole reason given by sustainability and energy management does not do justice to the versatility and possibilities of the methodology. In fact, another outstanding feature is the possibility of making unique reactive intermediates accessible in a controlled and predictable manner. Organic electrosynthesis is a rich and continually evolving field that offers numerous opportunities to synthetic chemists who are willing to step out of their comfort zone, as witnessed by the research papers and topical reviews of this Special Issue of ChemElectroChem. A significant share of these contributions deals with the generation of unique reactive intermediates and, concomitantly, with the development of new synthetic methods. As highlighted by several Reviews and Minireviews, the application of electrochemistry to new synthetic challenges, such as the synthesis of certain complex molecules or to the conversion of renewable raw materials, prove to be promising and fruitful areas. Other contributions focus upon the exploration of homogeneous and heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrosynthetic applications, a sub-discipline with plenty of room for further work. Until now, a great number of electrosynthetic reactions were exclusively carried out in batch mode, whereas flow electrosynthesis allows for efficient upscaling and minimization of both supporting electrolyte load and solvent consumption. Further opportunities lie in the investigation of electroorganic reaction mechanisms, especially since voltammetric approaches and spectroelectrochemical methods have evolved significantly in recent decades and have become available on a broader basis. Other contributions highlight the opportunities at the interface between electrochemistry and materials (polymers) as well as in the fields of innovative electrode materials and electrolyte concepts. In short, the possibilities to advance organic synthesis with electrochemical methods are great and, as this Special Issue demonstrates, the synthetic community has already started to unlock this potential. Apart from the wealth of ideas and possible research projects, it is also important to keep an eye on what needs to be done to sustainably establish electrochemistry as a part of organic synthesis. This will certainly involve increased teaching efforts, including the routine incorporation of the chemistry into basic and advanced textbooks, as well as a closer exchange with industrial chemists. After all, the future of this technology depends crucially on well-trained young scientists and on people outside the academic environment recognizing its great value and potential. Robert Francke studied chemistry at Bonn University (Germany) and Alicante University (Spain). In 2008, he received his diploma degree (equivalent to a M.S. degree) from Bonn University, where he subsequently started working on his dissertation under the direction of Prof. S. R. Waldvogel. After relocation of the Waldvogel Group, he completed his dissertation on fluorinated electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage devices at Mainz University (Germany) in 2012. Funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Feodor Lynen Fellowship), he then joined the group of Prof. R. D. Little at the University of California, Santa Barbara (USA), where he entered the field of organic electrosynthesis. In 2014, he returned to Germany to start his independent career at Rostock University as a Liebig Fellow (Fonds der Chemischen Industrie). Aside from developing new electrosyntheses and sustainable electrolyte concepts, his research group is currently active at the intersection between catalysis and electrochemistry. Shinsuke Inagi received his PhD from Kyoto University (Japan) in 2007 under the direction of Prof. Yoshiki Chujo. After a postdoctoral research fellowship (Research Fellowship for Young Scientists of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JSPS) at Kyoto University, he joined the group of Prof. Toshio Fuchigami as an Assistant Professor at Tokyo Institute of Technology (Japan) in 2007. He was promoted to Lecturer in 2011, then to Associate Professor in 2015. He has concurrently been a PRESTO researcher of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) since 2018. His current research interests include electrosynthesis of functional organic/polymeric materials. He is the recipient of the Tajima Prize of the International Society of Electrochemistry (ISE) in 2019. R. Daniel Little (Dan) studied chemistry and mathematics in the USA at the University of Wisconsin in Superior, the University of South Dakota (two summers sponsored by the National Science Foundation), and Argonne National Laboratory (one semester). Graduate work was accomplished in the group of Howard Zimmerman at the University of Wisconsin, and postdoctoral studies with Jerome Berson at Yale. Other than sabbaticals at the University of British Columbia (Canada), the Beijing Institute of Technology (China), and the University of Regensburg (Germany), Dan has spent his entire academic career at the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB, USA). There he has served in many capacities including Department Chair. Dan has been interested in electrochemistry for many years and has worked on the development and mechanistic understanding of a number of well-known electrochemical transformations. He remains keenly interested in electron transfer and mediated processes carried out both electrochemically and photochemically. He is a past recipient of the Heyrovsky Prize from the International Society of Electrochemistry (ISE).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,078
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,185
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle