Problems in Gas Hydrates: Practical Guidelines for Field Remediation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Problems in Gas Hydrates: Practical Guidelines for Field Remediation J.E. PAEZ; J.E. PAEZ Dalhousie University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar R. Blok R. Blok MARTEC LTD. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 2001. Paper Number: SPE-69424-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/69424-MS Published: March 25 2001 Connected Content Related to: Practical Guidelines for Field Remediation of Gas Hydrates Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation PAEZ, J.E., and R. Blok. "Problems in Gas Hydrates: Practical Guidelines for Field Remediation." Paper presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/69424-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractNatural gas hydrate formation is a costly and challenging problem for the oil and gas industry. In recent years, two new families of chemical additives have been commercially developed to prevent hydrate plugging problems in production lines. This approach is commonly known as low-dose inhibition, and the two families are kinetic inhibitors and anti-agglomerants. Evolution of these new products is proceeding at a rapid pace, in order to meet goals of covering a greater range of operating conditions and finding an economically and environmentally attractive alternative to thermodynamic inhibition.Successful deployment of low-dose inhibitors depends on an appropriate selection of inhibitors and a complete understanding of the system. Based on a synthesis of available literature on application of low-dose inhibitors to hydrocarbon processing equipment and handling facilities, this paper describes a methodology for designing a deployment strategy. This guide provides a systematic approach to aid production engineers in deploying low-dose inhibitors in existing facilities and new developments. An easy-to-follow flow chart is given.The information provided in this article was compiled from published data, and experience provided by several companies in the oil and gas industry.IntroductionNatural gas hydrate formation is a costly and challenging problem for the oil and gas industry and tends to be most critical for offshore facilities. Since the time when hydrates were first identified1, the oil and gas industry has injected a constant flow of resources into the search for an economic and environment friendly solution to the problem of hydrate prevention.Thermodynamic inhibition has been the conventional approach to natural gas hydrate inhibition. System composition or operating conditions are altered so that over the range of operating temperatures and pressures, the hydrocarbon system falls outside the pressure-temperature region in which hydrate formation can occur. (See Figure 1)2.Keeping operating pressures and temperatures out of the hydrate formation region can be achieved by making system adjustments such as applying heat, using insulated pipelines, or adding chemical compounds (thermodynamic inhibitors) that change the behaviour of the new mixture. Keywords: society of petroleum engineers, practical guideline, spe 69424, ldis, upstream oil & gas, concentration, field trial, successful deployment, martec ltd, flow assurance Subjects: Flow Assurance, Hydrates This content is only available via PDF. 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».