Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
W. R. Ward (1925–2010) was one of the most respected historians of his generation. Known to scholars of Methodist and Wesleyan traditions for his Religion and Society in England 1790–1850 (1972), for his two-volume edition of the correspondence of Jabez Bunting, and for his collaboration with Richard Heitzenrater in the seven volumes of John Wesley's journals and diaries issued by the Wesley Works Project, Reg Ward's expertise ranged widely across religious, social, and political history in many countries and several centuries. The present volume, edited with an affectionate and informative introduction by Andrew Chandler, illustrates the breadth of Professor Ward's interests and the depth of his learning. Chapters on Gottfried Arnold and Gerhard Tersteegen are juxtaposed with reflections on the reception of Dietrich Bonhoeffer in the former German Democratic Republic and on the extent to which the early writings of Karl Barth may truly be said to show Socialist political leanings; J. S. Bach and Emanuel Swedenborg keep company with Francis Asbury and Thomas Coke; the influence of Paracelsus is discussed alongside the Wesleyan doctrine of the Pastoral Office; the effectiveness (or otherwise) of church establishments is considered with reference to eighteenth-century England and late twentieth-century Switzerland. As well as giving an insight into an historian of wide interests, formidable scholarship and trenchant opinions, this collection of articles, spanning some thirty years, offers the reader access to several significant essays. For the present reviewer, Professor Ward's articles ‘Power and piety: the origins of religious revival in the early eighteenth century’ (1980), ‘The religion of the people and the problem of control’ (1971), and ‘The legacy of John Wesley: The Pastoral Office in Britain and America’ (1973) made the most compelling reading, placing the revival in a broad European context, analysing the challenges confronting Wesleyan Methodism in the age of Bunting, and tracing the trajectories of Methodist itinerancy in Britain and North America in the decades either side of Wesley's death. It is good to be reminded of the fluidity and flexibility of the revival, and of its multiple spiritual and intellectual antecedents, before the advent of greater denominational and institutional control. Reg Ward's erudition, particularly in the byways of European mysticism and Pietism, demands attentive reading in order fully to appreciate his important insights. The editor recognizes that he was ‘contrarian – and waspishly anticlerical’ (11), and there are times when this theme becomes uncomfortable (for instance, in the repeated dismissal of Bunting as ‘execrable’ on pages 133 and 144, and in some of Ward's ventures into contemporary Methodist and ecumenical politics, especially in the concluding sentences of the final essay). There are some unfortunate proofreading slips, including the consistent misspelling of ‘Heitzenrater’ and the (possibly Freudian) rebranding of Lloyd George's 1935 Call to Action as a ‘call to fiction’ (215). All in all, however, this is a useful volume, and a welcome tribute to a great historian.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle