Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Joyce Johnston (bio) Recent decades in French studies have witnessed a flourishing interest in women writers. Whether exploring the significance of contemporary women writers or seeking to rediscover women of centuries past who have been cast outside of mainstream literary canon, scholars now turn their attention to these unjustly overlooked artists. In comparison to these rediscoveries of women writers in many genres, the study of women and the theater has in many respects lagged behind in terms of literary scholarship. Why is it that those who produce works for the most public of all the literary arts remain most invisible to contemporary scholarship? The daring nature of staging one’s work for immediate consumption and criticism renders writing for the stage a daunting prospect for writers of any gender. Yet throughout the centuries and spanning multiple continents women boldly have penned works for public display, showcasing their uniquely feminine points of view on issues ranging from politics, sexuality, trauma and oppression to domestic bliss and motherhood. Whether their works were critical and popular successes or failures, these women insisted their voices be heard and their experiences be staged regardless of critical backlash. Inspiration for this volume came from the Fourth International Women in French conference held at Wagner College in May 2010. Two special sessions highlighting women and theater organized by Cecilia Beach ignited interest, but also bewilderment that to date no single analytical publication exists dedicated to the diversity and richness of women’s contributions to Francophone theater. In spite of the fact that keynote speakers for the past three Women in French conferences (Louise Dupré 2006, Perry Gethner 2008, and Judith Miller 2010)1 illuminated the significance, uniqueness and innovation of women dramatists from France and Quebec, there is much critical work left to be done to do justice to these artists and their theatrical productions. Particularly regarding plays by French women prior to the twentieth century, out-of-print texts and precious little critical investigation render research in this domain challenging. There does, nonetheless, appear to be a growing interest in this area. Jane Moss’s “Women’s Theater in France” brought to light the richness and social significance of women dramatists’ productions during the 1980s. Judith Miller and Christiane Makward’s Plays by French and Francophone Women: A Critical Anthology, did much to underscore the intricacy and innovation of modern theater by Francophone women writers and to introduce these exceptional plays by women to a new audience. Likewise, Perry Gethner’s editions of plays by French women up to 1750 and Louise [End Page 15] Forsythe’s editions of theater from Quebec broaden readership of these works. Cecilia Beach’s two-volume checklist of works by French women playwrights published by Greenwood Press documents the rich corpus of plays published and performed in France alone over the last five centuries and serves as an essential tool for those conducting research in this area. Recent critical works such as Carole Edwards’s Les Dramaturges antillaise: cruauté, créolité, conscience féminine and Strategies of Resistance in the Dramatic Texts of North African Women: A Body of Words by Laura Chakravarty Box explore the powerful and innovative theater of women in other regions of the Francophone world and represent crucial steps forward in literary criticism of women and theater. However, a lack of any single volume of critical essays devoted to the work of French and Francophone women dramatists demonstrates a theoretical gap. As Alison Finch suggests, many women dramatists remain invisible, unnoticed and unrecognized by their contemporaries as well as by modern criticism (Finch 62). Clearly, there is much work to be undertaken in regards to the study of Francophone women playwrights and it is worth exploring the interconnections of themes explored by women who have written for the stage throughout the ages. Our volume seeks to begin filling this critical void in rediscovering unjustly forgotten women dramatists and contextualizing them with more recent women dramatists who have become bold innovators of theatrical production throughout the French-speaking world. Whether their performances break with traditional molds, revisit traumatic experiences, forge new theatrical techniques or comment upon gender inequities, all the playwrights in this study in one...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».