An Integrated Experimental Study of Foamy Oil Flow During Solution Gas Drive
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract One of the important mechanisms in the primary production of heavy oil reservoirs under solution gas drive is the foamy oil flow effect. This form of flow occurs only under certain combinations of capillary, viscous and gravity forces. Several studies have been carried out to examine this effect on the recovery process, but it remains poorly understood and difficult to model. The objective of this study was to examine the roles of capillary, viscous, and gravity forces in foamy oil flow. Primary depletion experiments were conducted in a twometer long sand-pack holder to measure the oil and gas production at different depletion rates. The effect of gravitational forces was investigated by comparing the experiments conducted in horizontal and vertical orientations of the 2-meter long sand-pack. In the vertical orientation, the solution gas drive performance was evaluated with the production from the bottom end of the sand-pack, as well as with production from the top end. The experimental results are presented in terms of the oil and gas production behavior affected by the capillary number and gravity forces. The results indicate that the gravity forces do not significantly influence the ultimate oil recovery when the oil is produced under foamy oil flow. Even at the lowest depletion rate used in these tests, when oil flow and gravity act in the same direction, gas gravity segregation did not improve the oil recovery significantly. Recovery efficiency and the critical gas saturation at which free gas flow starts are primarily dependent on the capillary number. Introduction Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in the world show anomalous primary production under solution gas drive. Smith1 was one of the first researchers who presented a detailed analysis of such unusual production behavior. Since then, it has been the subject of many studies, due to its importance in making reliable projections of future production and optimization of field operations. These studies can be divided into three categories. The first category focuses mainly on the geomechanical aspects.2,3 It is believed that the production of sand with oil improves the inflow performance by the creation of wormholes (high permeability channels). Experimental and theoretical studies3,4 have shown that the high pressure gradients present during cold production can overcome the cohesive strength of the sand matrix and this leads to the creation of wormholes. However, the mechanics of wormhole network development are not yet clear. The second category focuses on multiphase flow behavior, and can be further divided into two subcategories. First are the conventional two-phase flow models5,6 which suggest that solution gas drive, whether in light oils or in heavy oils, is describable by the critical gas saturation and oil-gas relative permeability. In these, the high oil recovery is attributed mainly to low gas mobility. However, a good field performance match is not obtained by using low gas mobility; it also requires enhanced permeability far from the wellbore due to sand production7. The second subcategory of multiphase flowbased models is based on foamy oil flow.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».