MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4254702440 · doi:10.1002/9783527808465.emc2016.4914

Generation with phase‐and‐amplitude electron holograms of Laguerre‐Gauss beams with orbital angular momentum up to 200ħ

2016· other· en· W4254702440 sur OpenAlexaff
Federico Venturi, R. Balboni, Gian Carlo Gazzadi, Marco Campanini, Ebrahim Karimi, Vincenzo Grillo, Stefano Frabboni, Robert W. Boyd

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typeother
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectronPhysicsElectron holographyAngular momentumHolographyLandau quantizationOpticsWave functionPhase (matter)Plane waveQuantum mechanics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Phase‐and‐amplitude electron holograms provide a flexible way to encode an arbitrary wavefunction by modulating only the hologram phase [1] [2]. This is an innovative step in the direction of novel experiments with structured electron waves [3]. The most interesting application example is the generation of Laguerre‐Gaussian (LG) beams as they can be used to match exactly a single Landau state of electrons inside the objective lens of a transmission electron microscope (TEM). LG beams are a solution of the paraxial Schrödinger equation. They are mainly characterised by two indexes: l, the azimuthal index, representing the orbital angular momentum (OAM), and p, the radial index, where p+1 is the number of intensity radial nodes. They will be referred to with the contract notation LG(l,p). Landau states, on the other hand, are the quantized eigenstates of a charged particle with OAM in a magnetic field. Remarkably, LG beams have, at a given plane, the same form of quantized Landau states [4]. They only differ in the z evolution: while in a magnetic field Landau states are non‐diffractive, LG beams in vacuum expand with defocus but maintain the same intensity shape. We fabricated the holograms with Focused Ion Beam (FIB) on Si 3 N 4 membranes. As a first check of fabrication accuracy, the Energy Filtered‐TEM thickness map is taken. Thickness maps can be considered as a measure of the phase of the electron wavefunction after the hologram. In the first row of figure 1 thickness maps of the holograms LG(0,10), LG(10,0) and LG(10,10) are shown. The second row shows on top the experimentally acquired intensity at the Fraunhofer plane, and at the bottom the intensity and phase (represented by the colour hue) calculated with the software STEM_CELL starting from the thickness maps. The beams with l=10 show indeed the well‐known azimuthal phase ramp of vortex beams while the beams with p=10 show 11 intensity nodes in radial direction with alternating phase as prescribed for LG beams. This allows us to say that we were able to produce LG beams with arbitrary l, p indexes. If the LG beam was generated inside the magnetic field of the objective lens of a TEM, this would permit the visualization of exact Landau states. A more direct test of the LG character of these beams is obtained by visualising their shape invariance after propagation. To this aim, we investigated the propagation behaviour of the beam LG(10,0) with simulations, with w 0 is the beam waist and z R = π W 0 2 /λ is the Rayleigh range for electrons with wavelength λ. Simulations are shown in the first row of figure 2, reporting the beam intensity shape propagated over Δz distance. When propagating, the beam width increases but the circular intensity shape remains the same. This is not true in general for all vortex beams. In order to make a comparison, we generated a vortex beam with 10ħ OAM (named L=10). The second row of figure 2 shows the experimental intensity of the beam L=10, acquired at the Fraunhofer plane (Δz = 0), and with different defocuses. The external intensity ripples are due to the abrupt intensity profile of the hologram (which in this case was not made with the phase‐and‐amplitude technique) and have the same character at all defocuses. The shape of the vortex, which is the circle with maximum intensity, with increasing defocus develops some internal ripples: this beam is therefore not shape invariant after propagation. As a further instance of the improvements due to the phase‐and‐amplitude scheme with respect to the previous ones, in figure 3 a phase‐and‐amplitude LG(200,0) beam (a) and its radial profile (b) is compared with an ordinary hypergeometric‐Gauss beam with L=200ħ (c) and its profile (d). The striking feature is the transverse confinement of the intensity in the LG beam, with respect to L=200 that shows many external ripples. Generating beams with phase‐and‐amplitude holograms shows clear advantages, from the suppression of the unwanted beam intensity ripples to the control of radial and azimuthal degrees of freedom of LG beams, and is of great importance in order to generate shape‐invariant LG beams that can match exactly a single Landau state.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,300
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsMême sujetOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsTravaux en français237 207