Notice bibliographique
Résumé
s memoir is a joyous guide to a life in the Canadian foreign service, and reassuringly he also shows that there is a life after bureaucracy.Graham joined the foreign service when becoming a Canadian diplomat was thought to be a Good Thing.Canada's Department of External Affairs managed to look glamorous from the outside, and proved to be interesting and often strenuous from the inside.Though the foreign service had its share of clunks and incompetents, and ran a few posts that competed with Devil's Island for isolation and discomfort, it was usually much better than that, and there were real rewards -not the least of which was to join an international profession that required its members always to understand the other point of view and not simply to parrot instructions from head office in Ottawa.Diplomatic life could be pleasant.There were indeed parties and receptions and dinners.Other diplomats from other countries could be, and often were intelligent, good company, and sometimes lifelong friends.It could also be stressful, as Graham shows, hair-raising, and occasionally tragic -as he also shows.Life abroad with allowances was mitigated by home duty: ice and snow in Ottawa, and quite often a modest lifestyle.It was (and is) the equivalent of the slave riding in a chariot with a Roman conqueror, whispering in his ear, "Remember, you are but mortal."Canadian foreign policy when Graham was a diplomat was run from a smallish ministry that had been originally attached to the prime minister's office (with a lower case "o" at a time when it had not achieved the grandeur and size it has today).That meant it was located in a neo-Gothic pile, the East Block of Canada's Parliament buildings, where prime ministersxiv could keep an eye on it.Indeed for almost forty years the prime minister was also styled "Secretary of State for External Affairs" to distinguish him from the "Secretary of State," who handled patents and other forms.In the 1940s, "the Department" (all such entities were called departments before ascending in nomenclature to be "ministries") acquired its own minister, and two of them, Louis St. Laurent and Lester B. Pearson, went on to be prime minister: it seemed a natural step.Pearson even collected a Nobel Peace Prize as he passed Go.Under the minister came the under-secretary, the deputy minister.The under-secretary was a homebody, minding the store, running errands ("interfacing" today) between the political and the bureaucratic, rewarding, punishing, stretching budgets and generally keeping his fractious brood in line.He (for they were all male in Graham's period) occasionally had to suppress bad ideas from ambitious ambassadors."For the son-ofa-bitch," one under-secretary growled when an ambassador in Cuba produced a plan for harmony between the United States and communist Cuba.In that case his staff calmed the enraged deputy minister, but sometimes diplomats found themselves abruptly yanked and returned to Ottawa to contemplate life from within the department's Historical Division.It was understood that ministers, and more broadly the cabinet, made policy, and the diplomats executed it.It was also their function to give advice, as practically as possible, for ministers to adopt or disregard.As a general rule, however, the advice bore some resemblance to the policy adopted, and the policy, in turn, helped shape the advice.For that to be so, there had to be some common ground or at least mutual confidence.Most day-to-day work sailed comfortably under the ministerial radar.Readers will find very few ministerial irruptions in Graham's volume, and rightly so.Diplomats on post had considerable freedom to conduct their work as they saw best, disturbed only by very infrequent visits from superiors from headquarters or sorties by ministers in search of trade and publicity.An ambassador or high commissioner could address the local Drones Club or Meathead Society and nobody in Ottawa would be any the worse -in fact, better for not following up on such mundane details.Common ground and mutual confidence also applied to relations among foreign missions in a given capital.Sometimes this was necessary for survival or more usually comfort, pooling supplies, or shopping at the same commissary.This shared cordiality even applied to contacts *George Vest, stationed in the US embassy in Ottawa, 1951-54, desk officer for Canada in the State Department, 1954-57.Vest later became Inspector-General of the Foreign Service.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».