MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4255168101 · doi:10.5858/2006-130-1751-uodmas

Use Of Digital Maps and Sampling of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

2006· article· en· W4255168101 sur OpenAlexaff
Kiril Trpkov, Larry Warman

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDigital Imaging in Medicine
Établissements canadiensCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProstatectomyDigital pathologyZoomComputer scienceDigital imagingDigital imageComputer graphics (images)MedicineArtificial intelligenceComputer visionImage processingGeologyImage (mathematics)Prostate

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor.—The use of digital technology is replacing the traditional methods of prostatectomy handling in the pathology laboratory. We have recently started using digital maps for radical prostatectomy specimens in our centralized urologic pathology service. In our gross room we have installed the MacroPATH system (Milestone Medical, Bergamo, Italy), which can be mounted on (or next to) the grossing station. The system has a digital camera and a touch screen monitor and allows capture and saving of macroscopic images of gross specimens. The completely sectioned prostatectomy specimen is laid out and a digital image is captured using a foot control system that also has a zoom in/out control. The image of the specimen is labeled with the surgical number of the case, which is the only step of the procedure that requires use of a keyboard. The system also allows for automatic specimen measurement from the image, labeling of the image for specimen orientation (eg, apex/base, left/right), and enumeration of the sampled blocks (Figure 1). This is done on a screen monitor using a plastic pen tool. Our pathology technologists spend on average 15 minutes to complete this procedure. The system requires an introductory in-service training of 1 hour and it is simple to use. The signing pathologist can access the digital images of the specimen through the information system, or alternatively the images can be e-mailed to the pathologist. A hard copy map of the specimen can be printed (in color or black and white) and used during case sign-out for block orientation and recording of the prostatectomy findings. The images can be stored permanently and retrieved using the system software and they can be incorporated into digital and hard copy pathology reports. We also routinely capture a digital image of the accompanying requisition of the specimen for quality assurance (eg, to avoid mismatch errors if multiple prostatectomies are grossed the same day). Prostatectomy specimen handling using either digital or photocopy maps essentially obviates the need for whole mount (or whole organ) prostatectomy processing. Whole mount prostatectomy processing has several technical and cost issues associated with it, such as use of large blocks and glass slides that require separate fixation, processing, storage, and use of separate microtomes for block cutting by personnel with special technical expertise.In our practice, digital prostatectomy maps have replaced the photocopy prostatectomy maps that we have used for many years and that were generated by laying out prostatectomy slices on a transparent Plexiglas plastic board.1 The transparent board was labeled for apex/ base and left/right orientation; the slices were then covered with another transparent board. This allowed for easier specimen handling to obtain a photocopy and to generate a prostatectomy working map for the pathologist (Figure 2). Proper orientation of the specimen required attention because the map represented a mirror image of the grossed specimen. To avoid the removal of the specimen from the gross room and contamination of the office space and copier, we had a dedicated copier for this purpose in the grossing room.We process yearly 300 to 350 radical prostatectomies and we fix all specimens en bloc in 10% neutral buffered formalin for at least 24 hours. The specimens are submitted in toto using a standard grossing protocol. Complete submission is optimal and we find it justified because the majority of the patients present currently with nonpalpable disease (stage T1c) and show lower tumor volumes. Although the survey conducted in the United States in 1994 indicated that only in 12% of the laboratories radical prostatectomies had been submitted in toto, this number has likely increased; unfortunately there are no data of the current sampling practices.2 However, a systematic partial prostatectomy sampling may reduce the number of sampled blocks and still may allow for adequate specimen sampling.13 In our practice, the specimens are painted over the surface with black (left) and blue (right) dye, and the anterior is painted green. The seminal vesicles are amputated at the prostate junction and a complete longitudinal section is obtained from each vesicle; the junction area on both sides is painted yellow. The prostatectomy specimen is serially sectioned, resulting in prostate slices of 3 to 4 mm thickness, representing transverse planes parallel to the initial apical and basal sections. The apical and basal margins (also 3–4 mm thick) are sectioned perpendicularly to assess the resection margin status. Each slice of the prostate is processed, depending on its size, into complete, halved, or quartered sections to fit the standard size cassettes and 1 hematoxylin-eosin slide is sectioned per block.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,646
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineMême sujetDigital Imaging in MedicineTravaux en français237 207