MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4255230027 · doi:10.5250/studamerindilite.22.1.128

Review

2010· article· en· W4255230027 sur OpenAlex
Partice Hollrah

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDanceIndigenousPoliticsModern danceHistoryAnthropologyNative American studiesSociologyArtLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The People Have Never Stopped Dancing: Native American Modern Dance Histories Patrice Hollrah (bio) Jacqueline Shea Murphy. The People Have Never Stopped Dancing: Native American Modern Dance Histories. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007. ISBN: 978-0-8166-4776-7. 296 pp. Jacqueline Shea Murphy takes the title of her examination of Native American modern dance histories from Leslie Marmon Silko's novel Almanac of the Dead and quotes Silko in the epigraph to the introduction, "Dance as Document": "Throughout the Americas, from Chile to Canada, the people have never stopped dancing; as the living dance, they are joined again with all our ancestors before them, who cry out, who demand justice, and who call the people to take back the Americas!" (1). Murphy chooses an apt quotation to describe the political implications of dance for Indigenous peoples in her quest to explore the relationships "between Native American dance and the history and development of modern dance in America" (4). In a well-researched and documented investigation, the author engages with Native dance, always placing her analysis in the contexts of Native sovereignty, land, community, culture, history, politics, economics, spirituality, colonization, and Christianity. Her approach avoids the objectification of Natives and instead focuses on a "dance studies model, with its attention to corporeality and the energies and agencies engaged by bodies moving, within particular frames and contexts, in time and space" (8), allowing her to see Native American dance as a "form of knowledge and history" (9), a document of sorts. Murphy acknowledges her position as a non-Native scholar who presents herself as an expert on Native [End Page 128] American dance and realizes that she must address her relation to the subject with integrity, which she does by sharing her research with the Native dancers and choreographers before publication of her book. The first part of the book, "Restrictions, Regulations, Resiliencies," contains three chapters, and the first, "Have They a Right? Nineteenth-Century Indian Dance Practices and Federal Policy," discusses U.S. and Canadian governmental policies that restricted Native dancing from the 1880s through 1951. In the second chapter, "Theatricalizing Dancing and Policing Authenticity," Murphy shows how the governments contained Native agency by allowing stage representations of Indians in shows like Buffalo Bill's Wild West, in which audiences could see Indians as exciting but safe. Murphy includes François Delsarte's ideas about the body's correspondences between inner emotion and outward gesture, the "real" and "natural," ideas grounded in Christian thought: "as Delsarte promoted it, bodily movement expressed the godlike universal 'truth' of inner selves" (53–54). On the one hand, the staged production created "authentic" Indians for the public's consumption, and on the other hand, the Native performers had control over their own bodies in the arena. Native dancers and the Delsartian theory of Christianized ideals contributed to a "modern dance rhetoric that also saw dance as accessing a natural" (80). The final chapter of part 1, "Antidance Rhetoric and American Indian Arts in the 1920s," deals with the continued federal efforts to curtail Native American dancing, the Native American dancers' response to the restrictions, and non-Native artists and intellectuals' protests. Murphy researches hundreds of letters and documents in the U.S. National Archives that illustrate how American Indian voices express different worldviews of religion: "These responses indicate conceptions of dance as integral both to religious practices and to land and water rights and link attempts to curtail dancing with desire for Indian land and resources" (82–83). Federal rhetoric labeled Indian dance as "wasteful" and "excessive"; non-Native supporters of Indian rights argued for Native American dance as "art" and "amusement" (83). Neither the federal officials nor the non-Native [End Page 129] artists see Native American dance as a fundamental part of religious practice. The second part of the book, "Twentieth-Century Modern Dance," begins with the chapter "Authentic Themes: Modern Dancers and American Indians in the 1920s and 1930s," that analyzes U.S. choreographers' attraction to Native American dance in the context of federal Indian policies of the 1920s and 1930s—for example, the American Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1935. American Indian dance, like American Indian...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,882
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,401
Écart entre enseignants0,377 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle