Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is my fourth editorial letter to you in 2011, since being elected as Editor-in-Chief of International Surgery by the governance of the International College of Surgeons in late 2010.In my initial personal letter to you in the first quarter issue of International Surgery, I emphasized that we have the highest goals for our Journal and that we have much work to do in this reference. Clearly, I requested then, and repeat here, that I and my team need all of your enthusiastic, dedicated support to accomplish the lofty goals that we so rightly have set for International Surgery. In the second quarter issue, I emphasized the importance of peer review, which leads to overall quality improvement and our eventual achievement of our goals. In the third quarter issue, I addressed the analysis and plans being developed to electronically distribute International Surgery to all Fellows of the International College of Surgeons, and to all institutional subscribers, by electronic means only, beginning in 2012. In all of these communications, I have requested your questions and thoughts, as we value you, our readers, very highly.I am delighted to report to you that the International College of Surgeons governance formally approved, last month, the implementation of our plans for electronic publishing and electronic distribution of International Surgery beginning in 2012. This means, in brief, that every dues paying Fellow in the International College of Surgeons will receive every issue of International Surgery without a separate assessment of fees in payment for receiving International Surgery.While the case has already been made for implementing the above actions, it might be worthwhile to briefly communicate what is happening in our segment of the scientific/medical publishing industry. A review of the major seventeen general surgery titles, with impact factors (reported in the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports), indicates that sixteen of the these titles are available in full online text to their readers. Clearly, given the decisions taken by the ICS governance, International Surgery may now be included in this group of leading surgery publications.The International College of Surgeons has the vision of improving the lives of patients through the education and development of the field of surgery in over 100 countries of the world where the International College of Surgeons has member Fellows. Our education, communications, and leadership missions will be significantly enhanced. For those persons conducting research and writing research papers, our electronic publishing system will serve them well. Our Journal, International Surgery, via online electronic publishing, will increasingly serve as the key modality to fulfill our vision and missions, as the College progresses into the future. Online publishing allows us to provide more value to our Fellows per dollar expended, and will greatly expand our Journal audience.We are also very pleased that International Surgery will continue to provide the opportunity to establish and enhance professional relationships, and provide the opportunity for every reader and Fellow to enhance their professional identity and responsibility.We look forward to implementing these exciting plans in 2012.Thank you.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».