Chemostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz in Southern Alberta
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz (BQ) of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) is the basal part of the Lower Mannville Formation, which, together with the overlying Upper Mannville, is considered one of the most prolific hydrocarbon-bearing successions in the WCSB. However, due to the reservoir complexity often associated with low accommodation settings, detailed stratigraphic studies are required to fully exploit the potential. This paper presents the preliminary findings of a chemostratigraphic study on the finer grained sediments of the upper Cycle of the BQ, i.e., the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie units. The work was undertaken to determine whether or not chemostratigraphy has the potential to deliniate between stratigraphic units in low accommodation settings. By selection of cored intervals in wells whose stratigraphy had previously been determined, it is shown that the silty claystones of the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie exhibit significantly different elemental compositions. Introduction The Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz (BQ) is an informal term for the Lower Mannville succession, which together with the "Ostracode", forms the Lower Mannville Formation (Fig. 1). In southern Alberta, the BQ is thin (<100m), and is characterized by a complex stratigraphy punctuated by multiple unconformities (Zaitlin et al, 2002; Lukie et al., 2002, Ardies et al., 2002). Based upon detailed stratigraphic and petrographic differentiation (Fig. 2), the BQ is divisible into seven mappable units (Fig. 3). Regional A, Mesa IV, Valley and Terrace, Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie). This chemostratigraphic study has concentrated on the upper cycle composed of the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie units. The sandstones of these three units, which are unconformably overlain by the brackish marine "Ostracode", display upward increasing mineralogical and textural maturity (Fig. 2). Extensive thin section work on the sandstones of the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie units has allowed recognition of distinctive petrographic features for each unit. Claystones form a significant proportion of each unit. Therefore, a method for determining the stratigraphic affinities of a claystone sample will allow greater stratigraphic understanding. The primary objective of this paper, therefore, is to demonstrate that the technique of chemostratigraphy is capable of clearly differentiating the finer grained lithologies from the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie units. Chemostratigraphy, or chemical stratigraphy, involves the characterisation and correlation of strata using major and trace element geochemistry. For this study, data for a total of 47 elements (10 major elements, 23 trace elements and 14 rare earth elements) have been determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emissions spectrometry (ICPAES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The sample preparation and analytical procedures are detailed in Pearce et al (1999) and Jarvis and Jarvis (1995). Study Material and Methodology Conventional cores from 6 wells (1-35-1-20 W4, 2-4- 1-17 W4, 7-9-11-16 W4, 6-11-26-28 W4, 10-29-36-27 W4 and 3-30-37-27 W4) were sampled for this study. The intervals sampled have already been stratigraphically assigned (Zaitlin et al2002, Table 1); A total of 90 samples have been collected from these wells (Table 1). When sampling the core, apparently homogenous silty claystone chips approximately 2-3cm3 were selected for analysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».