Field Test of SAGD as Follow-up Process to CSS in Liaohe Oilfield of China
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Du 84 block of Shu-1 area in the Liaohe Oilfield is located in Panjin city of Liaoning province of China. The production formation, Guantao, contains extra heavy oil with a depth of 530-640 meters. The reservoir is characterized in thick pay, high permeability and very active aquifer. The dead oil viscosity is 230,000 mPa.s at 50 °C. Although Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) process using vertical wells has been applied successfully in producing oil from the reservoir, the anticipated ultimate oil recovery is less than 29% of the original oil in place (OOIP). To enhance oil recovery beyond that of the CSS, physical and numerical modeling studies were carried out. The Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process using the combination of the vertical wells and horizontal wells was proposed to be the follow-up process to CSS. Additional 27% recovery is anticipated with the proposed follow-up process. This gives a total recovery of 56%. A pilot with four horizontal producers was implemented in the field. CSS was used initially in the horizontal wells for establishing the communication with the surrounding vertical wells. The pilot was then converted successfully to SAGD operations with horizontal wells as continuous producers and some of the surrounding vertical wells as continuous injectors. A total of 44,500 tonnes of oil has been produced so far during the last 12 months of SAGD operations. The field implementation process and pilot performance as well as the challenges with this project are presented in this paper. Introduction This paper is the continuation of the work presented in 2003's CIM conference [1]. In that paper, a field pilot was proposed for testing Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) as a followup process to CSS based on the reservoir modeling work and feasibility studies. Two field pilot projects were constructed in 2003 in Du 84 block of Su-1 area in Liaohe oilfield. One pilot is producing from the Xinglongtai formation and the other one is producing from the Guantao formation. The pilot in the Guantao formation was converted to SAGD operations in early 2005 and the field results are encouraging. This paper is going to report the field performance for this pilot. Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process, which was described by Dr. R.M. Butler in the late 1970s[2], has been applied successfully for the production of bitumen and heavy oil since it was tested in the Underground Test Facility (UTF) in the Fort McMurray oil sand, Alberta, Canada[3]. Several commercial projects have been implemented in the field in Canada since then. Liaohe oilfield constructed the first SAGD pilot in China in 1996 in the Xinlongtai formation, which contains extra heavy oil at a depth of 750 meters deep from the surface. The pilot consisted of one stacked well pair and was operated for about one year and half. The suspension of the pilot test was due to (1.) not sufficient lift capacity provided by gas lift system; (2.) difficult in communication resulted from too large vertical separation between the injector and producer.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».