Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyThis Month in Pediatric Urology1 Aug 2019This Month in Pediatric Urology Mark P. Cain Mark P. CainMark P. Cain More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000349AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Incidental and Symptomatic Renal Cyst in a Pediatric Cohort undergoing Ultrasonography With increasing use of abdominal imaging in children for a wide variety of diagnoses, urologists have been confronted with an increasing number asymptomatic renal cysts. This new “problem” is like our past challenges in refining the evaluation and management (as well as meaningfulness) of neonates found to have urinary tract dilation on prenatal ultrasound. More than 30 years later we still struggle with the definition of normal variants of perinatal urinary tract dilation that do not require long-term imaging surveillance or surgical intervention, which is similar to our current understanding of renal cysts in children. To help delineate the need for and duration of followup of asymptomatic renal cysts in children, O’Kelly et al (page 394) from Canada reviewed the outcomes of 783 children found to have renal cysts on abdominal ultrasound serial imaging.1 Of this cohort 211 patients had complex cysts and only 4 (1.8%) had renal cancer detected at surgery. Notable findings included a small (<1%) incidence of conversion from simple to complex cyst on ultrasound in older teens with larger cysts at presentation. Followup studies revealed complete resolution of simple cysts in 25% of cases. Based on the data presented and prior literature, the authors reasonably conclude that most asymptomatic renal cysts in children are benign and complex cysts (larger than 1.5 cm or with minimal change after 2 years) can be serially followed. 3D Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Pelvic Floor Dissection for Bladder Exstrophy Many of the recent technical advances in surgical reconstruction of bladder exstrophy have included a more aggressive dissection of the abnormal pelvic floor muscles of the perineum together with pelvic osteotomies to establish a more normal urogenital diaphragm and potentially improve continence. A key element is placement of the closed bladder and reconstructed bladder outlet/urethra in a more posterior and inferior location next to the levator muscles. To identify these structures intraoperatively with little radiographic guidance has historically relied on surgeon experience. To assist with defining the pelvic musculature during surgical reconstruction for bladder and cloacal exstrophy, Di Carlo et al (page 406) from Baltimore, Maryland used a combination of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with a new intraoperative magnetic resonance image-guided navigation system developed by Brainlab®.2 During surgery the critical soft tissue and bone landmarks were identified and confirmed by a senior radiologist and senior pediatric urologist with a high level of accuracy, both during dissection and placement of the bladder unit into the posterior levator muscle group. There were no device related complications, and minimal additional operative time in 44 consecutive cases. Potential advantages of this type of surgical and radiographic correlation during repair of exstrophy would be lower risk of failed bladder closure and improved continence with more accurate placement of the bladder in the reconstructed pelvis. This technology also offers the advantage as a teaching and training tool for rare diseases such as bladder exstrophy. References 1. : The prevalence, clinicodemographics, and outcomes of incidental and symptomatic renal cysts in a pediatric cohort undergoing ultrasonography. J Urol 2019; 202: 394. Link, Google Scholar 2. : 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging guided pelvic floor dissection for bladder exstrophy: a single arm trial. J Urol 2019; 202: 406. Link, Google Scholar © 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 202Issue 2August 2019Page: 183-183 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Mark P. Cain More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,686 | 0,429 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».