MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4255974284 · doi:10.1063/1.1809101

Anthony Houghton

2004· article· en· W4255974284 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Ling, Brad Marston, Bob Pelcovits

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiquePhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhysicsCondensed matter physicsEngineering physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anthony Houghton, a world-renowned theoretical condensed matter physicist, died of cancer on 28 July 2003 in Providence, Rhode Island. Born on 4 October 1935 in Heanor, England, Tony received a BSc in mathematical physics from the University of Birmingham in 1956. His 1959 PhD thesis, “Non-Perturbative Approach to Impurity Resistance in Metals,” was conducted at Birmingham under the supervision of Geoffrey Chester in the group of Rudolph Peierls. Tony carried out postdoctoral research at the Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie Mellon University) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the University of California, San Diego (UCSD); and at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.In 1963, Tony joined Brown University in Providence as an assistant professor in the physics department and rapidly rose through the academic ranks. During his career at Brown, he made many lasting contributions to condensed matter physics as the single author and coauthor of more than 90 papers. His early work focused on aspects of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity, including ultrasonic attenuation. In a well-known collaboration in 1973 with Franz Wegner, then at the Institut für Festkörperfoschung, KFA Jülich, Germany, Tony made an important contribution to renormalization group theory by developing a differential form of the recursion relations.During the 1980s, Tony turned to the physics of strongly correlated electrons and carried out pioneering work on the use of the 1/N expansion to describe the Anderson impurity model. After the 1986 discovery of high-temperature superconductors, Tony worked with collaborators to develop a theoretical description of the melting of the vortex lattice; that description provided excellent agreement with experimental data.Much of Tony’s attention during the 1990s was devoted to the physics of fermion liquids. Alan Luther and Duncan Haldane showed that bosonization could be extended to dimensions greater than one, and Tony spent much of that decade exploring the ramifications of those ideas. During that period, he also was Brown’s physics chair (1992–98).Tony held visiting professorships at many European and American institutions, including Oxford University and UCSD. He held Science Research Council fellowships and, in 1977, won an Alexander von Humboldt Senior Scientist Award. Tony was a superb teacher and mentor to his students and junior colleagues. He taught a wide range of classes, from introductory pre-med to many-body theory, and prepared and delivered his lectures with the utmost care and diligence. Throughout his life, Tony ventured into new physics with the energy and determination of a young person just starting in the field, and he did not take the easy way out. He worked through every complicated calculation himself and understood each detail of all of his collaborative efforts, whether with his students or other researchers. Colleagues would pass by his office and see him bent over his desk doing page after page of calculations to fill in the details of important papers in an emerging field; he was convinced that this was the only way to truly master a new subject.Despite a diagnosis of cancer in early 1999, Tony maintained high spirits and often used his wry sense of humor to calm his concerned colleagues. He continued to work on strongly correlated systems during a period of remission. But in late 2002, the cancer reappeared and his condition deteriorated quickly. A blackboard covered with equations and derivations remained in his office after his death.Anthony HoughtonBROWN UNIVERSITYPPT|High resolution© 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,243
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,739

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismTravaux en français237 207