MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4256548958 · doi:10.1111/rssc.12422

Applied Statistics

2021· article· en· W4256548958 sur OpenAlexaff
Nial Friel, Janine Illian, Sophy Barber, Patrick Brown, Antonio Canale, Nikolaos Demiris, Ye Fan, X. Huang, Maria Iannario, Thomas Jaki, Ian H. Jermyn, Pierre Latouche, D. Libel, Ioanna Manolopoulou, Giampiero Marra, Eleni Matechou, R. X. De Menezes, Ioannis Ntzoufras, Antony M. Overstall, Theodore Papamarkou, Dennis Prangle, Xavier Paolettí, R. Radice, Nikos Tzavidis

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Établissements canadiensCancer Care Ontario
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStatisticsComputer scienceMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society is published in three series: Series A (Statistics in Society), Series B (Statistical Methodology) and Series C (Applied Statistics). Each series publishes contributed papers as well as papers (with discussion) which have been read at discussion paper meetings of the Society. Discussion paper meetings are held up to 10 times a year. They span a very wide range of topics and suitable papers may fall into any of the following categories: a study of an applied statistical problem of sufficient general interest to warrant discussion and publication; new methodology; an interesting and new application of existing methodology; issues of general interest to statisticians, especially if a wide variety of views is to be found; work concerned with the interface between statistics and other fields; ‘state of the art’ reviews and critical summaries of important material which is widely scattered. Papers for reading must be of a nature which will generate discussion. They should not exceed 12000 words (or 24 printed pages) in length. Series A publishes high quality papers that demonstrate how statistical thinking, design and analyses play a vital role in all walks of life and benefit society in general. There is no restriction on subject-matter: any interesting, topical and revelatory applications of statistics are welcome. For example, important applications of statistical and related data science methodology in medicine, business and commerce, industry, economics and finance, education and teaching, physical and biomedical sciences, the environment, the law, government and politics, demography, psychology, sociology and sport all fall within the journal’s remit. The journal is therefore aimed at a wide statistical audience and at professional statisticians in particular. Its emphasis is on well-written and clearly reasoned quantitative approaches to problems in the real world rather than the exposition of technical detail. Thus, although the methodological basis of papers must be sound and adequately explained, methodology per se should not be the main focus of a Series A paper. Of particular interest are papers on topical or contentious statistical issues, papers which give reviews or exposés of current statistical concerns and papers which demonstrate how appropriate statistical thinking has contributed to our understanding of important substantive questions. Historical, professional and biographical contributions are also welcome, as are discussions of methods of data collection and of ethical issues, provided that all such papers have substantial statistical relevance. Series B aims to publish high quality papers on the methodological aspects of statistics and data science more broadly. The objective of papers should be to contribute to the understanding of statistical methodology and/or to develop and improve statistical methods; any mathematical theory should be directed towards these aims. The kinds of contribution considered include descriptions of new methods of collecting or analysing data, with the underlying theory, an indication of the scope of application and preferably a real example. Also considered are comparisons, critical evaluations and new applications of existing methods, contributions to probability theory which have a clear practical bearing (including the formulation and analysis of stochastic models), statistical computation or simulation where original methodology is involved and original contributions to the foundations of statistical science. Reviews of methodological techniques are also considered. A paper, even if correct and well presented, is likely to be rejected if it only presents straightforward special cases of previously published work, if it is of mathematical interest only, if it is too long in relation to the importance of the new material that it contains or if it is dominated by computations or simulations of a routine nature. Series C promotes papers that are focused on statistical methods for real life problems. Applications should be central to papers, rather than illustrative, to motivate the work and to justify any methodological developments. All papers should feature an adequate description of a substantial application and a justification for any new theory. Case-studies may be particularly appropriate, and should include some contextual details, though there should also be a novel statistical contribution, for instance by adapting or developing methodology, or by demonstrating the proper application of new or existing statistical methods to solve challenging applied problems. Papers describing interdisciplinary work are especially welcome, as are those that give interesting novel applications of existing methodology or provide new insights into the practical application of methods, and papers explaining innovative analysis of generic applied problems but not necessarily focused on a particular application also have a place in Series C. Short communications may also be appropriate. Methodological papers that are not motivated by a genuine application are not acceptable; nor are papers that include only brief numerical illustrations or that mainly describe simulation studies of properties of statistical techniques. However, papers describing developments in statistical computing and machine learning are encouraged, provided that they are driven by practical applications. Extended algebraic treatment should be avoided. See the inside back cover for details on the submission of papers. Further notes on the preparation and submission of manuscripts are available on request. All communications with regard to the journals, except about subscriptions, should be addressed to The Journals Manager, The Royal Statistical Society, 12 Errol Street, London, EC1Y 8LX, UK (e-mail: [email protected]). Information for subscribers For details on subscription rates and advertising, see the inside front cover.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,030
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,177
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,304

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0300,177
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0080,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,005
Communication savante0,0110,006
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0910,056

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)Même sujetAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsTravaux en français237 207