Long-term effects of high-intensity interval training, moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training and Nordic walking on physical and mental health in patients with coronary artery disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Postdoctoral Fellowship Background/Introduction Twelve weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (MICT) and Nordic walking (NW) have been shown to improve functional capacity, quality of life (QoL) and depression in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, their long-term effects are unknown. Purpose The primary purpose was to compare the long-term effects and sustainability of 12 weeks of HIIT, MICT and NW on functional capacity. The secondary purpose was to assess the long-term effects and sustainability of 12 weeks of HIIT, MICT and NW on QoL and depression severity. Methods Patients with CAD were randomized to a 12-week HIIT, MICT or NW program. Functional capacity, QoL and depression severity were measured at baseline, at the end of 12 weeks of intervention, and following 14 weeks of observation phase (week 26). Functional capacity was measured with a 6-minute walk test (6MWT); QoL was assessed by the HeartQoL and Short-Form-36; and depression severity by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The long-term effects (changes between baseline and week 26) and sustainability (changes between week 12 and week 26) were assessed by linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results Of 130 participants randomized, 86 (HIIT: n=29, MICT: n=27, NW: n=30) completed week 26 assessments. There were significant improvements in 6MWT distance (F=149.657, p<0.001), QoL and depression severity (both p<0.05) from baseline to week 26; the increase in 6MWT distance was greater for NW when compared to MICT (F=7.021, p=0.010) and HIIT (F=5.279, p=0.025, Figure). Between week 12 and week 26, 6MWT distance (F=10.863, p=0.001) and physical QoL (physical component summary [PCS]; F=4.084, p=0.047) increased significantly, whereas mental QoL significantly decreased (mental component summary [MCS]; F=4.052, p=0.047). Conclusion HIIT, MICT and NW have positive long-term impacts on functional capacity, QoL and depression severity. However, NW was shown to confer additional benefits in increasing long-term functional capacity. The positive effects of the 12-week exercise programs were sustained at week 26 except for mental QoL.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».