MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4280551512 · doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100271

E-11 | Single vs. Multiple Operators for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

2022· article· en· W4280551512 sur OpenAlexaff
Judit Karácsonyi, Khaldoon Alaswad, Oleg Krestyaninov, Dimitrios Karmpaliotis, Ajay J. Kirtane, Ziad A. Ali, Margaret McEntegart, Amirali Masoumi, Paul Poomipanit, Farouc A. Jaffer, Jaikirshan Khatri, James W. Choi, Mitul Patel, Michail Koutouzis, Ioannis Tsiafoutis, Şevket Görgülü, Anthony Doing, Abdul Malik Sheikh, Basem Elbarouni, Wissam Jaber, Ahmed ElGuindy, Robert W. Yeh, Spyridon Kostantinis, Bahadir Simsek, Bavana V. Rangan, Olga Mastrodemos, Evangelia Vemmou, Ilias Nikolakopoulos, Imre Ungi, Khalid Tammam, Nidal Abi Rafeh, Ömer Göktekín, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Yader Sandoval

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensSt. Boniface Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoronary occlusionPercutaneousPercutaneous coronary interventionMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineOcclusionPsychological interventionMyocardial infarctionNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BackgroundThere is limited data on the impact of a second operator on chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes.MethodsWe analyzed the association between multiple operators (MO) (>1 attending operator), and procedural outcomes of 9,296 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 37 centers.ResultsCTO PCI was performed by a single operator (SO) in 85% of the cases and by MO in 15%. Mean patient age was 64.4±10 years and 81% were men. SO cases were more complex with higher Japan-CTO (2.38 ± 1.29 vs. 2.28 ± 1.20, p=0.005) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores (1.13 ± 1.01 vs. 0.97 ± 0.93, p<0.001) compared with cases performed by MO. Procedural times (131 [87, 181] vs. 112 [72, 167] min, p<0.001), fluoroscopy times (49 [31, 76] vs. 42 [25, 68] min, p<0.001), air kerma (2.32 vs. 2.10, p<0.001), and contrast volumes (230 vs. 210, p<0.001) were higher in MO cases compared to SO. Cases performed by MO and SO had similar technical (86% vs. 86%, p=0.9) and procedural success rates (84% vs. 85%, p=0.7) as well as major adverse complication event rates (MACE 2.17% vs. 2.42%, p=0.6). On multivariable analyses multiple operators was not associated with higher technical success, or lower MACE rates (Figure 1).ConclusionsDisclosuresK. Alaswad: consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI: Consulting; D. Karmpaliotis: Abbott: Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Speaker Bureau; Saranas: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Soundbite: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Traverse Vascular: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Z. A. Ali: Abbott: Advisory Board/Board Member; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Amgen: Advisory Board/Board Member; Astra Zeneca: Speaker Bureau; Shockwave Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; F. A. Jaffer: sponsored research support from Kowa, Canon, Siemens, Teleflex, Shockwave, and Amarin; consultant for Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Siemens, Magenta Medical, Asahi Intecc and IMDS; has an equity interest in Intravascular Imaging, Inc. and DurVena, I: Consulting; J. Khatri: Medtronic, Abbott, Boston, Terumo, Asahi speaker/proctor.: Consulting; M. P. Patel: Abbott: Consulting; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Consulting; Medtronic: Consulting; W. A. Jaber: consultant for Inari: Consulting; A. Elguindy: Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott Proctorship fees: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo Educational grants: Medtronic: Consulting; K. O. Tammam: Terumo: Consulting; E. S. Brilakis: Abbott: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; AMgen: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Asahi Intecc: Speaker Bureau; Biotronik: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; ControlRad: Speaker Bureau; CSI: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; GE Healthcare: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; Hippocrates LLC: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; MHI Ventures: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Cleerly Health: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Stallion Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; J. Karacsonyi Nothing to disclose. O. Krestyaninov Nothing to disclose. A. J. Kirtane Nothing to disclose. M. McEntegart Nothing to disclose. A. Masoumi Nothing to disclose. P. Poomipanit Nothing to disclose. J. W. Choi Nothing to disclose. M. Koutouzis Nothing to disclose. I. Tsiafoutis Nothing to disclose. Ş. Görgülü Nothing to disclose. A. Doing Nothing to disclose. A. M. Sheikh Nothing to disclose. B. Elbarouni Nothing to disclose. R. W. Yeh Nothing to disclose. S. Kostantinis Nothing to disclose. B. Simsek Nothing to disclose. B. V. Rangan Nothing to disclose. O. C. Mastrodemos Nothing to disclose. E. Vemmou Nothing to disclose. I. Nikolakopoulos Nothing to disclose. I. Ungi Nothing to disclose. N. Abi Rafeh Nothing to disclose. Ö. Göktekin Nothing to disclose. Y. B. Sandoval Nothing to disclose. BackgroundThere is limited data on the impact of a second operator on chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. There is limited data on the impact of a second operator on chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. MethodsWe analyzed the association between multiple operators (MO) (>1 attending operator), and procedural outcomes of 9,296 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 37 centers. We analyzed the association between multiple operators (MO) (>1 attending operator), and procedural outcomes of 9,296 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 37 centers. ResultsCTO PCI was performed by a single operator (SO) in 85% of the cases and by MO in 15%. Mean patient age was 64.4±10 years and 81% were men. SO cases were more complex with higher Japan-CTO (2.38 ± 1.29 vs. 2.28 ± 1.20, p=0.005) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores (1.13 ± 1.01 vs. 0.97 ± 0.93, p<0.001) compared with cases performed by MO. Procedural times (131 [87, 181] vs. 112 [72, 167] min, p<0.001), fluoroscopy times (49 [31, 76] vs. 42 [25, 68] min, p<0.001), air kerma (2.32 vs. 2.10, p<0.001), and contrast volumes (230 vs. 210, p<0.001) were higher in MO cases compared to SO. Cases performed by MO and SO had similar technical (86% vs. 86%, p=0.9) and procedural success rates (84% vs. 85%, p=0.7) as well as major adverse complication event rates (MACE 2.17% vs. 2.42%, p=0.6). On multivariable analyses multiple operators was not associated with higher technical success, or lower MACE rates (Figure 1). CTO PCI was performed by a single operator (SO) in 85% of the cases and by MO in 15%. Mean patient age was 64.4±10 years and 81% were men. SO cases were more complex with higher Japan-CTO (2.38 ± 1.29 vs. 2.28 ± 1.20, p=0.005) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores (1.13 ± 1.01 vs. 0.97 ± 0.93, p<0.001) compared with cases performed by MO. Procedural times (131 [87, 181] vs. 112 [72, 167] min, p<0.001), fluoroscopy times (49 [31, 76] vs. 42 [25, 68] min, p<0.001), air kerma (2.32 vs. 2.10, p<0.001), and contrast volumes (230 vs. 210, p<0.001) were higher in MO cases compared to SO. Cases performed by MO and SO had similar technical (86% vs. 86%, p=0.9) and procedural success rates (84% vs. 85%, p=0.7) as well as major adverse complication event rates (MACE 2.17% vs. 2.42%, p=0.6). On multivariable analyses multiple operators was not associated with higher technical success, or lower MACE rates (Figure 1). Conclusions DisclosuresK. Alaswad: consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI: Consulting; D. Karmpaliotis: Abbott: Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Speaker Bureau; Saranas: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Soundbite: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Traverse Vascular: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Z. A. Ali: Abbott: Advisory Board/Board Member; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Amgen: Advisory Board/Board Member; Astra Zeneca: Speaker Bureau; Shockwave Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; F. A. Jaffer: sponsored research support from Kowa, Canon, Siemens, Teleflex, Shockwave, and Amarin; consultant for Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Siemens, Magenta Medical, Asahi Intecc and IMDS; has an equity interest in Intravascular Imaging, Inc. and DurVena, I: Consulting; J. Khatri: Medtronic, Abbott, Boston, Terumo, Asahi speaker/proctor.: Consulting; M. P. Patel: Abbott: Consulting; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Consulting; Medtronic: Consulting; W. A. Jaber: consultant for Inari: Consulting; A. Elguindy: Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott Proctorship fees: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo Educational grants: Medtronic: Consulting; K. O. Tammam: Terumo: Consulting; E. S. Brilakis: Abbott: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; AMgen: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Asahi Intecc: Speaker Bureau; Biotronik: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; ControlRad: Speaker Bureau; CSI: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; GE Healthcare: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; Hippocrates LLC: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; MHI Ventures: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Cleerly Health: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Stallion Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; J. Karacsonyi Nothing to disclose. O. Krestyaninov Nothing to disclose. A. J. Kirtane Nothing to disclose. M. McEntegart Nothing to disclose. A. Masoumi Nothing to disclose. P. Poomipanit Nothing to disclose. J. W. Choi Nothing to disclose. M. Koutouzis Nothing to disclose. I. Tsiafoutis Nothing to disclose. Ş. Görgülü Nothing to disclose. A. Doing Nothing to disclose. A. M. Sheikh Nothing to disclose. B. Elbarouni Nothing to disclose. R. W. Yeh Nothing to disclose. S. Kostantinis Nothing to disclose. B. Simsek Nothing to disclose. B. V. Rangan Nothing to disclose. O. C. Mastrodemos Nothing to disclose. E. Vemmou Nothing to disclose. I. Nikolakopoulos Nothing to disclose. I. Ungi Nothing to disclose. N. Abi Rafeh Nothing to disclose. Ö. Göktekin Nothing to disclose. Y. B. Sandoval Nothing to disclose. K. Alaswad: consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI: Consulting; D. Karmpaliotis: Abbott: Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Speaker Bureau; Saranas: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Soundbite: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Traverse Vascular: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Z. A. Ali: Abbott: Advisory Board/Board Member; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Amgen: Advisory Board/Board Member; Astra Zeneca: Speaker Bureau; Shockwave Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; F. A. Jaffer: sponsored research support from Kowa, Canon, Siemens, Teleflex, Shockwave, and Amarin; consultant for Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Siemens, Magenta Medical, Asahi Intecc and IMDS; has an equity interest in Intravascular Imaging, Inc. and DurVena, I: Consulting; J. Khatri: Medtronic, Abbott, Boston, Terumo, Asahi speaker/proctor.: Consulting; M. P. Patel: Abbott: Consulting; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.: Consulting; Medtronic: Consulting; W. A. Jaber: consultant for Inari: Consulting; A. Elguindy: Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott Proctorship fees: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo Educational grants: Medtronic: Consulting; K. O. Tammam: Terumo: Consulting; E. S. Brilakis: Abbott: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; AMgen: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Asahi Intecc: Speaker Bureau; Biotronik: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; Boston Scientific Corp.: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; ControlRad: Speaker Bureau; CSI: Consulting and Speaker Bureau; GE Healthcare: Consulting, Principal Investigator for a Research Study and Speaker Bureau; Hippocrates LLC: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; MHI Ventures: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Cleerly Health: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; Stallion Medical: Ownership Interests: Stocks, Stock Options; J. Karacsonyi Nothing to disclose. O. Krestyaninov Nothing to disclose. A. J. Kirtane Nothing to disclose. M. McEntegart Nothing to disclose. A. Masoumi Nothing to disclose. P. Poomipanit Nothing to disclose. J. W. Choi Nothing to disclose. M. Koutouzis Nothing to disclose. I. Tsiafoutis Nothing to disclose. Ş. Görgülü Nothing to disclose. A. Doing Nothing to disclose. A. M. Sheikh Nothing to disclose. B. Elbarouni Nothing to disclose. R. W. Yeh Nothing to disclose. S. Kostantinis Nothing to disclose. B. Simsek Nothing to disclose. B. V. Rangan Nothing to disclose. O. C. Mastrodemos Nothing to disclose. E. Vemmou Nothing to disclose. I. Nikolakopoulos Nothing to disclose. I. Ungi Nothing to disclose. N. Abi Rafeh Nothing to disclose. Ö. Göktekin Nothing to disclose. Y. B. Sandoval Nothing to disclose.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,056
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,187

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0560,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsMême sujetCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsTravaux en français237 207