MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4280589121 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.11.22274935

Investigating Causal Associations of Diet-Derived Circulating Antioxidants with Risk of Six Major Mental Disorders: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2022· preprint· en· W4280589121 sur OpenAlexaff
Hao Zhao, Xue Han, Lingjiang Li, Xuening Zhang, Yuhua Liao, Huimin Zhang, Wenyan Li, Jingman Shi, Wenjian Lai, Wanxin Wang, Roger S. McIntyre, Kayla M. Teopiz, Lan Guo, Ciyong Lu

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesGillings School of Public Health
Mots-clésMendelian randomizationInternal medicineMajor depressive disorderAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderConfidence intervalMedicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Relative riskRandomized controlled trialPsychologyPsychiatryPhysiologyBiologyGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Observational studies have suggested associations between circulating antioxidant levels and many mental disorders, but evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking and causal inferences have not been confirmed. The aim of this study was to explore whether genetically predicted diet-derived circulating antioxidants were causally associated with the risk of major mental disorders using Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods and findings We performed 2-sample MR analyses of summary-level genetic data to explore whether diet-derived circulating antioxidants [e.g., vitamins E (α- and γ-tocopherol), ascorbate, retinol, β-carotene, and lycopene], assessed by absolute circulating antioxidants and relative circulating antioxidant metabolites, were causally associated with the risk of six major mental disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BIP), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The inverse-variance weighted method was adopted as primary MR analyses and five additional MR methods (likelihood-based MR, MR-Egger, weighted median, penalized weighted median, and MR-PRESSO) and different outcome databases were used for sensitivity analyses. We found suggestive evidence that genetically predicted higher absolute circulating α-tocopherol levels marginally reduced the risk of SCZ, with the odds ratio (OR) per unit increase in log-transformed α-tocopherol values was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.94; P = 0.016]. However, after adjusting for multiple testing (threshold of P < 0.008), we found no significant evidence that genetically predicted higher diet-derived absolute circulating antioxidant levels and antioxidant metabolites concentrations were significantly causally associated with the six-foregoing major mental disorders. Conclusions Overall, our study does not support significant causal associations of genetically predicted diet-derived circulating antioxidants with the risk of major mental disorders. Therefore, simply taking antioxidants to increase blood antioxidants levels is unlikely to have a significant protective effect on the prevention of most mental disorders. Author summary Why was this study done? Some observational studies have reported that diet-derived circulating antioxidants are associated with a reduced risk of major mental disorders; however, these studies are susceptible to uncertain temporal relationships, insufficient sample sizes, or potential confounding factors, and thus it remains unclear whether these associations are accurate. To our knowledge, there are no randomized clinical trials published to date on this topic. Since oxidative stress is closely related to the occurrence of mental diseases, if diet-derived circulating antioxidants can reduce the risk of major mental disorders, it will be an interesting target as primary prevention of mental disorders. What did the researchers do and find? We performed a Mendelian randomization study design to explore whether genetically predicted diet-derived circulating antioxidants [e.g., vitamins E (α- and γ-tocopherol), ascorbate, retinol, β-carotene, and lycopene], assessed by absolute circulating antioxidants and relative circulating antioxidant metabolites, were causally associated with the risk of six major mental disorders, including major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder, attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Overall, our study provides suggestive evidence that genetically predicted higher absolute α-tocopherol levels may be causally associated with a reduced risk of schizophrenia. However, our study did not find genetically predicted significant causal associations of dietary antioxidants with major mental disorders after correction for multiple testing. What do these findings mean? Our findings suggest for healthy adults without nutritional deficiency, simply taking antioxidants to increase blood antioxidants levels is unlikely to have a significant protective effect on the prevention of most mental disorders. In the future, large-scale GWASs are needed to further validate our current findings, especially the suggestive protective effect of higher α-tocopherol levels on schizophrenia, by utilizing additional genetic variants and more samples.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,037
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,196

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0370,073
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxivMême sujetAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressTravaux en français237 207