MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4280596950 · doi:10.1002/ctm2.860

Frequent exacerbators in severe asthma: Focus on clinical and transcriptional factors

2022· letter· en· W4280596950 sur OpenAlex
Neil C. Thomson

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical and Translational Medicine · 2022
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAsthma and respiratory diseases
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAsthmaIntensive care medicineDiseasePulmonologyPediatricsInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Approximately 5% of adults with asthma have severe disease. Despite its relatively low prevalence, patients with severe asthma experience substantial morbidity due to poorly controlled symptoms, exacerbations, multiple comorbidities, and the adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids. These patients generate high healthcare costs from prescribed medications, outpatient care, and hospital admissions due to exacerbations. Surveys of adults with severe asthma have shown that most experience one or more exacerbations each year despite recommended therapies. The term “frequent exacerbator” is used to describe a clinical phenotype with ≥ 21, 2 or ≥ 31, 3 severe exacerbations in the previous year. Risk factors for frequent exacerbations include a history of severe exacerbations, chronic airflow obstruction, raised biomarkers of type 2 eosinophilic airway inflammation, a history of cigarette smoking, a high body mass index, chronic sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and low socioeconomic status.4 Management of frequent exacerbations in severe asthma includes the identification and targeting of treatable traits5 and the implementation of GINA recommendations on the treatment of severe asthma.6 Despite progress in understanding the clinical features, inflammatory pathways, and therapies available to prevent exacerbations in severe asthma,4 data are limited on the best approach to identify individuals who are at greatest risk of frequent exacerbations and on the inflammatory mechanisms underlying frequent exacerbator status. In the current issue of Clinical and Translational Medicine, Hoda and colleagues7 reported the results of a study designed to provide insights into the clinical and immunological factors underlying frequent exacerbations in 420 adults with severe asthma recruited to the U-BIOPRED (the Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcome) cohort. Baseline clinical variables and transcriptional data in blood, bronchial and nasal epithelial brushings, bronchial biopsies, and sputum cells among frequent exacerbators, defined as ≥ 2 exacerbations in the previous year, were compared with infrequent exacerbators, defined as a maximum of one exacerbation in the previous year. Longitudinal data were also analysed from 317 individuals with persistent frequent exacerbations or persistent infrequent exacerbations during 1 year of follow-up. The finding that two-thirds of the U-BIOPRED cohort were frequent exacerbators (≥ 2) confirms previous reports of a high prevalence of frequent exacerbators in severe asthma,1, 2 including data from the UK Severe Asthma Registry, which found that 71% of adults were frequent exacerbators (≥ 3).3 Collectively, these studies demonstrate the clinical importance of severe exacerbations among patients with severe asthma. Interestingly, longitudinal data showed that one-third of frequent exacerbators and one-third of infrequent exacerbators reversed exacerbation status during 1 year of follow-up, suggesting that the exacerbator phenotype in severe asthma can change over time. The study highlights several clinical variables associated with frequent exacerbations, including greater daily short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) use and a high asthma control questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score. In a large UK severe asthma registry population of 1592 patients, a high ACQ score (> 1.5) had the strongest association with frequent exacerbations irrespective of maintenance oral corticosteroid status.3 Whether a poor ACQ score alone or as a component of a composite risk score is useful in identifying frequent exacerbators among adults with severe asthma in clinical practice will require prospective studies. In the U-BIOPRED study, former smoking was associated with increased exacerbations at baseline,7 whereas in the UK Severe Asthma Registry population, a past smoking history correlated with frequent exacerbations only in patients on maintenance oral corticosteroids.3 Unexpectedly, Hoda and colleagues7 found that current smoking status was associated with a reduced risk of persistent frequent exacerbations, whereas other studies have reported that current smoking status8 or high pack-year history1 was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations in severe asthma. The reason for the contrasting findings is uncertain but may be due to differences between study populations in the proportion of current and former smokers, cumulative smoking history, oral corticosteroid use, or other variables. Over 100 gene signatures that might be involved in frequent exacerbations among adults with asthma were examined in the different biological samples collected by Hoda and colleagues.7 CEA Cell Adhesion Molecule 5 (CEACAM5) expression in bronchial biopsies was increased in frequent exacerbators compared to infrequent exacerbators, whereas transcripts in other compartments did not differ between exacerbator subgroups. Could CEACAM5 be implicated in the pathogenesis of frequent exacerbations? The CEACAM immunoglobulin superfamily is involved in numerous cell functions including differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis.9 In adults with severe asthma, bronchial epithelial CEACAM5 expression and gene signatures typical of the inflammatory airway response driven by bacterial infection are upregulated compared to healthy controls.10 CEACAM receptors, including CEACAM5, have been implicated in host defense against bacterial infections, particularly Moraxella catarrhalis and nontypable Haemophilus influenzae.9 The binding of bacteria to CEACAMs is thought to mediate bacterial adhesion and contribute to colonisation of the airways. Hoda and colleagues7 speculate that CEACAM5 could be involved in exacerbations due to bacterial infections among frequent exacerbators, possibly after viral respiratory infections.9 Confirmation of these findings could lead to the development of therapies targeting the epithelial CEACAM5 receptor among frequent exacerbators. Additionally, the frequent exacerbator status was associated with increased expression of type 1 inflammatory (virus-induced Th1 response), type 2 inflammatory, and corticosteroid insensitivity pathways in nasal brushings, bronchial biopsies, or sputum cells. There are limitations associated with these data, including a low number of transcription samples for some compartments, such as bronchial biopsies (13% of patients) and bronchial brushings (16% of patients), and the increase in CEACAM5 expression among frequent exacerbators at the baseline assessment was not confirmed in the 1-year follow-up study, possibly due to a reduced sample size of persistent frequent exacerbators. In conclusion, the study by Hoda and colleagues7 has provided new data on transcriptional factors in blood and airway samples associated with frequent exacerbations in severe asthma. Interestingly, increased CEACAM5 expression in bronchial biopsies was associated with frequent exacerbator status, whereas transcripts in other compartments did not differ between exacerbator subgroups. The findings need to be replicated in other populations of frequent exacerbators with severe asthma. Establishing whether the frequent exacerbating phenotype is associated with specific inflammatory pathways may contribute to the development of novel targeted therapies. No conflict of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,363
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,082
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle