MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4280638692 · doi:10.5325/bullbiblrese.32.1.0096

Die Theologie der Septuaginta / The Theology of the Septuagint

2022· article· en· W4280638692 sur OpenAlex
Jean Maurais

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin for Biblical Research · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Établissements canadiensAcadia University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The LXX.H handbook series was initiated following the conclusion of the Septuaginta Deutsch translation project in 2011. Several outstanding contributions were published: Einleitung in die Septuaginta (2016), Die Sprache der Septuaginta / The Language of the Septuagint (2016), and the present volume. Three other volumes are forthcoming and will focus on the textual history of the Septuagint, its historical context, and its reception history.The introductory essay is written by the editors and provides a comprehensive survey of the issues at hand. They argue that the subject as formulated in the title poses several problems. First, “the” Septuagint is a collection of translations produced by several individuals in various contexts over a long period of time. The textual evidence for several of these works is complex, and it appears doubtful at times whether the text of the initial translations can be recovered with a high degree of confidence. It is, of course, possible to base one’s research on a particular extant manuscript, but this will undoubtedly yield different results. Therefore, examining “the” Septuagint for its treatment of a theological topic is problematic. Recent scholarship often focuses on individual books instead, studying each translation independently. Only in a subsequent step can similarities (and differences) be traced. Second, the term “theology” also appears ill suited to this context. The editors claim that a focus on theological elements or accents seems more appropriate. Here also, several pitfalls must be avoided. Such accents are often observed by identifying semantic differences the Greek and Hebrew texts. Yet, these differences may be traced to several factors including variants in the Hebrew source text (the particulars of which are unknown to us) or the translation technique adopted by the translator. In some cases, he may not have understood his source text adequately, forcing him to make choices that may not be theologically motivated. Nevertheless, the choice of vocabulary can be instructive even in situations when the Greek term adequately renders the Hebrew. Finally, it remains paramount to distinguish between theological accents that are deliberately introduced during the translation process from the later theological interpretation of these texts. The editors set out a very prudent methodology for the task and their contribution is arguably the most significant of this volume.The rest of the volume is organized according to eight theological topics: 1) The one God and the human understanding of this reality, 2) the divine law, 3) the cult and encountering God, 4) prophecy and its discourse about God, 5) humans before God, 6) wisdom and the life before God, 7) people and covenant, and 8) the promise of a future in the presence of God. Some contributors wrote comprehensive essays that each trace one of these topics throughout the Septuagint corpus. Other topics were broken into subchapters and allotted to a plurality of contributors. Therefore, chapters vary considerably in length, and summarizing each essay is impossible in this context. I will therefore highlight some contributions and list others.Exploring the theme of the one God and how he is understood, Emanuel Tov’s essay focuses on the equivalents for various divine names in the Pentateuch. Tov is of the opinion that the earliest layer of the Septuagint text rendered the Tetragrammaton as ΙΑΩ, which was updated to κύριος at a later stage. Tov sees two significant theologically motivated equivalents in the divine names: κύριος παντοκράτωρ for יהוה צבאות and θεός for צור. Anne-Françoise Loiseau provides a comprehensive survey of how God is characterized in the Prophets. Divine titles and depictions of various divine beings are also addressed. Theologically motivated renderings are labeled “targoumismes,” which seems anachronistic in this context. Little attention seems to be paid to translation technique, and no summary of findings is provided. This is unfortunately true of several essays in that they offer numerous observations but little or no synthesis. Markus Witte provides a study of this theme in the context Wisdom literature while Andrés Piquer Otero does the same in the so-called Historical Books. The latter observes that such a study is particularly difficult in this corpus due to the complexity of its textual history. Some Septuagint renderings are probably earlier than MT and it is in the latter that one sometimes finds theological exegesis. Ralph Brucker closes this section with a chapter on Psalms and Odes.The theme of God’s law is addressed by Innocent Himbaza (Pentateuch), Herrie van Rooy (Prophets), Frank Ueberschaer (Wisdom), Martin Meiser (Historical books), and Alison Salveson (Psalter). Himbaza and van Rooy observe that while the Greek legal terminology is more varied, the term νόμος sees its semantic range expanded because of its frequent rendering of the Hebrew תורה. It becomes associated with the covenant or divine revelation, sometimes a corpus (or book), but more often its contents.Christian Eberhart’s essay covers the entirety of the topic of the cult and encountering God. He primarily explores subthemes related to the theology of the temple, altar, holiness, and purity, as well as a number of others. Evangelia Dafni examines the theme of prophecy and discourse about God while Johann Cook focuses on humans before God (chiefly in Proverbs and Job). Ludger Schwienhorst-Schönberger explores the theme of wisdom and life before God, studying, as can be expected, the so-called Wisdom literature, including Sirach and Wisdom of Solomon. Larry Perkins provides the longest essay (more than 100 pages) on the theme of people and covenant. He argues that the translators expressed in the main the theological ideas imbedded in their Hebrew source text. Theories to the effect that ἔθνος and λαός served to designate Gentiles (or people in general) on the one hand, and the chosen people on the other, are not supported by the data. These terms are rather the usual equivalents for גוי and עם, both of which can at times designate Israel and other nations. Other more nuanced findings are noted, such as the apparent emphasis in Greek Deuteronomy and Greek Joshua of the allotment of the land to Israel as inheritance. Holger Gzella closes the volume with a discussion of the theme of the promise of a future before God.The book concludes with indexes of Scripture references, parabiblical and classical texts, manuscripts, and modern and ancient authors. Though comprehensive in focus, one is left with the impression that much more remains to be explored for each of these topics and that methodological consistency remains a work in progress. These contributions nevertheless represent a good starting point for further investigations and for this we can be thankful. Those looking for an up-to-date treatment of the state of research in the quest for the “theology” of “the” Septuagint will be well served to consult it.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,932
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,209
Tête enseignante GPT0,453
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle