MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4280652509 · doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100321

LB-3 | Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies and Outcomes of STEMI Patients with COVID-19

2022· article· en· W4280652509 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Odayme Quesada, Logan Van Hon, Mina Madan, Mehmet Yıldız, Cristina Sanina, Laura Davidson, Wah Wah Htun, Jacqueline Saw, Santiago García, Payam Dehghani, Larissa Stanberry, Timothy D. Henry, Cindy L. Grines, Catherine P. Benziger

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Établissements canadiensGenome PrairieHealth Sciences CentreVancouver General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineConventional PCIChest painMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)CulpritInternal medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Reperfusion therapyDiabetes mellitusEmergency medicineDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BackgroundSTEMI patients with COVID-19 have high mortality. Females are known to have different presentation and worse outcomes than males with STEMI.MethodsThe North American COVID-19 STEMI (NACMI) registry is a prospective, multi-center registry of hospitalized STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection. We compared sex differences in clinical characteristics, management strategies and outcomes in those with confirmed COVID-19 infections.ResultsAmong 585 with STEMI and COVID-19, 154 (26.3%) were female. Compared to males, females were significantly older, had higher rates of diabetes and stroke/TIA and statin on admission (Table). Males were more likely to present with chest pain whereas females presented with dyspnea. Females more often had STEMI without an identified culprit lesion. Use of primary PCI as the reperfusion strategy was significantly higher in males, whereas medical therapy was higher in females. In-hospital mortality was 33% for females and 27% for males (p=0.217); there were also no significant sex differences in-hospital stroke or re-infarction, or composite primary endpoint.ConclusionsIn the largest study of STEMI patients with COVID-19 we found significant sex differences. Females were more likely to have no culprit lesion identified and treated with medical therapy, whereas males had culprit lesion identified and treated with primary PCI. In-hospital mortality was high for both sexes. Further investigation is needed to better understand sex-differences in the underlying etiology of STEMI.DisclosuresO. Quesada: National Institutes of Health (Heart, Lung and Blood): Principal Investigator for a Research Study; M. Madan: Medtronic: Advisory Board/Board Member; Novartis Canada: Advisory Board/Board Member; JAMP Pharma: Advisory Board/Board Member; Pendopharm: Advisory Board/Board Member; HLS Therapeutics: Consulting; S. Garcia: Edwards Lifesciences: Consulting and Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Medtronic: Consulting; C. Benziger: Amgen: Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Novartis: Principal Investigator for a Research Study; National Institutes of Health Aging (Preventable): Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Department of Defense (WARRIOR): Principal Investigator for a Research Study; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (TeenBP): Principal Investigator for a Research Study; L. Van Hon Nothing to disclose. M. Yildiz Nothing to disclose. C. Sanina Nothing to disclose. L. Davidson Nothing to disclose. W. W. Htun Nothing to disclose. J. Saw Nothing to disclose. P. Dehghani Nothing to disclose. L. Stanberry Nothing to disclose. T. D. Henry Nothing to disclose. C. L. Grines Nothing to disclose. BackgroundSTEMI patients with COVID-19 have high mortality. Females are known to have different presentation and worse outcomes than males with STEMI. STEMI patients with COVID-19 have high mortality. Females are known to have different presentation and worse outcomes than males with STEMI. MethodsThe North American COVID-19 STEMI (NACMI) registry is a prospective, multi-center registry of hospitalized STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection. We compared sex differences in clinical characteristics, management strategies and outcomes in those with confirmed COVID-19 infections. The North American COVID-19 STEMI (NACMI) registry is a prospective, multi-center registry of hospitalized STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection. We compared sex differences in clinical characteristics, management strategies and outcomes in those with confirmed COVID-19 infections. ResultsAmong 585 with STEMI and COVID-19, 154 (26.3%) were female. Compared to males, females were significantly older, had higher rates of diabetes and stroke/TIA and statin on admission (Table). Males were more likely to present with chest pain whereas females presented with dyspnea. Females more often had STEMI without an identified culprit lesion. Use of primary PCI as the reperfusion strategy was significantly higher in males, whereas medical therapy was higher in females. In-hospital mortality was 33% for females and 27% for males (p=0.217); there were also no significant sex differences in-hospital stroke or re-infarction, or composite primary endpoint. Among 585 with STEMI and COVID-19, 154 (26.3%) were female. Compared to males, females were significantly older, had higher rates of diabetes and stroke/TIA and statin on admission (Table). Males were more likely to present with chest pain whereas females presented with dyspnea. Females more often had STEMI without an identified culprit lesion. Use of primary PCI as the reperfusion strategy was significantly higher in males, whereas medical therapy was higher in females. In-hospital mortality was 33% for females and 27% for males (p=0.217); there were also no significant sex differences in-hospital stroke or re-infarction, or composite primary endpoint. ConclusionsIn the largest study of STEMI patients with COVID-19 we found significant sex differences. Females were more likely to have no culprit lesion identified and treated with medical therapy, whereas males had culprit lesion identified and treated with primary PCI. In-hospital mortality was high for both sexes. Further investigation is needed to better understand sex-differences in the underlying etiology of STEMI. In the largest study of STEMI patients with COVID-19 we found significant sex differences. Females were more likely to have no culprit lesion identified and treated with medical therapy, whereas males had culprit lesion identified and treated with primary PCI. In-hospital mortality was high for both sexes. Further investigation is needed to better understand sex-differences in the underlying etiology of STEMI.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsMême sujetCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsTravaux en français237 207