Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Student misbehavior is the behavior or actions of students that can cause problems, harm themselves or others, and violate moral and social values. Student misbehavior occurs in all schools from time to time. This study aims to determine (1) what factors influence the misbehavior of fourth grade students at SD Muhammadiyah Wirobrajan II, (2) what are the forms of student misbehavior in grade IV at SD Muhammadiyah Wirobrajan II. This type of research is a qualitative research using a case study paradigm. This research was conducted at SD Muhammadiyah Wirobrajan II Yogyakarta. The object of this research was the misbehavior of fourth grade students at SD Muhammadiyah Wirobrajan II Yogyakarta. The data collected in this study were interview transcripts, observation sheets, and documentation. The data analysis technique used the Miles and Huberman model, namely data collection, data presentation, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. Checking the validity of the data was done by using source triangulation technique. The results showed that (1) student misbehavior that appeared such as fighting, making trouble, and disobeying school rules. The misbehavior is not only caused by the students themselves but also caused by their families and the surrounding environment. The influence of the family includes the lack of attention from parents and family disharmony. An unfavorable environment also affects the incidence of student misbehavior. (2) the form of misbehavior committed by students, namely saying dirty sentences and disturbing friends during learning done on purpose, causing a commotion in class. The efforts of teachers and schools in overcoming student misbehavior are (a) giving a warning, (b) giving punishment, and (c) making a student agreement. These efforts are made to provide a deterrent effect so as not to repeat the misbehavior. Keyword : delinquency, elementary school. REFERENCES Afiyani, I., Wiarsih, C., & Bramasta, D. (2019). Identifikasi Ciri-ciri Perilaku Bullying dan Solusi Untuk Mengatasinya di Sekolah. Jurnal Mahasiswa BK An-Nur: Berbeda, Bermakna, Mulia, 5(3), 21–25. Ajeng N.N, Candra P. R, dan Nur L. 2020. Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosional dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Kutabumi IV Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Taman Cendekia. Vol. 04 NO. 01 Amalia, N, R. 2017. Peran parent CHILD RELATIONSHIP pada orientasi seksual gay. Jurnal Taman Cendekia. VOL. 01 NO. 01 Ali, A. & Gracey, D. 2013. Dealing With Student Distruptive Behaviour In The Classroom-A Case Example Of Coordination Between Faculty And Assistant Dean For Academic. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA. 10:1-15 Anitah, Sri. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Berger, R. J., & Gregory, P. D. (Eds.). (2009). Juvenile delinquency and justice: Sociological perspectives (p. 593). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Daradjat Zakiah. 2000. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Firman M, Muhammad A, P. dan Sofyan A. 2020. Implementasi pendidikan karakter melalui kegiatan pembinaan peserta didik dalam membentuk watak kuat-positif. Jurnal Taman Cendekia VOL. 04 NO. 01 Elly Malihah, Wilodati, dan Gytha Larasati Jerry. 2014. Kenakalan Remaja Akibat Kelompok Pertemanan Siswa. Forum Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 41 Kartini, Kartono. 1996. Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial. Bandung. CV Mandar Maju Kartini Kartono. 1988. Psikologi Remaja. Bandung : PT.Rosda Karya Kuper, Adam and Jessica Kuper. 2008. Ensiklopedia Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada Murray, Joseph and Farrington, David P. 2010 . Risk Factors for Conduct Disorder and Delinquency: Key Findings From Longitudinal Studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Vol 55. No 10 Morash, M. & Trojanowicz, C.R. 1983. Juvenile Delinquency (Concepts and Control). United State of America: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Nindya P.N & Margaretha R.2012. Hubungan Antara Kekerasan Emosional pada Anak terhadap kecenderungan Kenakalan Remaja. Jurnal Psikologis Klinis dan Kesehatan Mental Qaimi, A. (2002). Keluarga dan anak bermasalah. Bogor: Cahaya. Rohmawati, C. (2012). Usaha Guru Untuk Menangatasi Kenakalan Anak Kelas V SD Negeri Kliwonan 2 Masaran Sragen Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. PhD Thesis Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Santrock, J. W. 2011. Life Span Development. Perkembangan Masa Hidup Jilid 1 (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga Sarlito W, Sarwono 2012. Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta. PT Raja Grafindo Persada Sarwini. 2011. Kenakalan Anak (Juvenile Deliquency): Kausalitas Dan Upaya Penanggulannya. Jurnal Perspektif. Volume XVI No 4 Tahun 2011 Edisi September Spergel, I. A. (1978). Social development and social work. Administration in social work, 1(3), 221-233. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta Sofyan S, Willis. 2008. Remaja dan Masalahnya Mengupas Berbagai bentuk Kenakalan Remaja Narkoba Free Sex dan Pemecahannya. Bandung. Alfabeta Widodo, G. S., Hariyono, H., & Hanurawan, F. (2017). Persepsi Guru tentang Kenakalan Siswa: Studi Kasus di Sekolah Dasar “Raja Agung”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 23(2), 142-153.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle