A randomized phase II study of bevacizumab and weekly anetumab ravtansine or weekly paclitaxel in platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer NCI trial#10150.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
5514 Background: Mesothelin and its binder, antigen-CA125, are highly expressed in high grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancers (HGOC) and, can inhibit paclitaxel-induced cell death. Anetumab ravtansine (AR) is a fully-human antibody directed at the mesothelin antigen, conjugated to a tubulin polymerization inhibitor. We assessed the safety and activity of the combination AR/bevacizumab (ARB) versus weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB) in patients (pts) with platinum resistant HGOC. Methods: An initial run-in phase I assessed the safety of ARB. After determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), a multicenter 1:1 randomized phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the progression free survival (PFS) in pts with platinum resistant/refractory HGOC. Pts were stratified by platinum resistant or refractory and prior bevacizumab (bev). Eligibility required measurable disease and mesothelin tested positive centrally on archival tissue by IHC. No limitation on the number of prior lines of therapy. A futility analysis was planned at 35 PFS events. The control arm was weekly intravenous paclitaxel 80mg/m2 with bev 10mg/kg every 2 weeks. A CT was performed every 8 weeks for RECIST1.1 assessment. The toxicities were reported according to CTCAE version 5.1. NCT03587311. Results: 7 pts were enrolled in the run-in phase 1 and the RP2D determined as bev (10mg/kg) biweekly with AR (2.2mg/kg) weekly on a 28 day-cycle. In the phase 2, 57 pts were enrolled, 28 pts in the ARB and 29 pts in the control group. The positivity rate for mesothelin screening was 88%. Pts were heavily pre-treated, median prior lines of 3 (range (1-9) with 24 pts received prior bev (42%) and 13 pts were platinum refractory (7 in ARB and 6 in PB). At the time of 35 PFS events, one CR and 4 PR were observed (ORR = 18%) in the ARB arm, versus no CR and 16 PR in the weekly PB (ORR = 55%). The estimated median PFS was 5.3 (95% CI: 3.7-7.4) months for ARB and 9.6 (95% CI: 7.4-17.4) months for PB (HR = 1.7(95% CI: 0.9-3.4)). The median number of cycles were 4 (1, 29) and 8 (1, 19) respectively. The most common treatment-related AEs in the ARB arm were mostly grade 1/2 increase AST (71%) and ALT (64%), thrombocytopenia (61%), fatigue (57%), and peripheral neuropathy (46%). In the PB arm, the most common treatment-related AE were anemia (66%), neutropenia (59%), epistaxis (48%), fatigue (45%) and peripheral neuropathy (45%). Conclusions: At the time of futility analysis, weekly PB had better outcome than weekly ARB leading to the study termination. Molecular and blood analyses are on-going to assess potential biomarkers of response. This study highlights the importance of randomization in assessment of novel therapies and potential for re-challenge with bevacizumab. These data show that weekly PB is an effective regimen and can be considered as the control arm in platinum resistant HGOC. Clinical trial information: NCT03587311.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».