Mentoring is more than a mentor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent work has highlighted the substantial positive impact of multi-dimensional mentoring, particularly a mentoring network, in one’s professional development and overall well-being (SAGE Open 2017; doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710288) (Nat Comm 2022; doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28667-0). The Women in Soil Ecology (WiSE) network (https://womeninsoilecology.github.io) was born out of a desire to develop mentoring relationships between women from different institutions and career stages – to fill the gaps in traditional faculty–graduate student advising relationships. These gaps included the need for advice and role models in dealing with issues such as harassment and safety in the field and at conferences, work–life balance, navigating family and childcare responsibilities, equal pay and representation, and being a woman in the male-dominated field of soil science (Soil Sci Soc Am J 2019; doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2019.03.0085). Four years and an ongoing pandemic later, our network has grown into much more than we initially envisioned and now connects women with a passion for soil ecology from across the globe. Mentorship is at the core of what WiSE does but has many facets. We leverage a multitude of events, platforms, and programs to strengthen the vibrant community of WiSE. Virtual Meet and Greet events provide space for discussion of work and life challenges, and fuel networking for collaborations. We use skills-based workshops and career panels to teach and learn from one another, sharing in our personal and professional development journeys. WiSE’s social media and website platforms allow us to share job and funding opportunities, amplify each other’s voices through social media takeovers, and connect with women from all over the world. We organize conference sessions to highlight how women are paving the way in our field both in advancing science and in making soil ecology a more just and equitable community. And with our mentorship program, we coordinate mentoring pairs and trios by matching members across career stages, cultural backgrounds, and institutions (academic and non-academic) worldwide. Moving forward, we plan to expand our mentoring program by providing more diversified and mentor–mentee-specific programs including an Indigenous scholarship, journal club, comprehensive exam support group, and learning community (New Dir Teach Learn 2004; doi.org/10.1002/tl.129). Our ultimate goal is for current and future mentors and mentees to develop and cultivate their own mentorship style where both members learn from each other. This bolsters WiSE’s broader mission for members to develop meaningful relationships focused on shared experiences, knowledge transfer, and support outside the workplace. As our network grows, we keep learning how to support one another, harnessing the incredible potential that we hold both individually and collectively. Above and beyond mentoring, we are working to change the face of soil ecology. We are intentionally amplifying the voices of historically excluded groups of women and redefining what it means to be a ground-breaking scientist (pun intended!). We equally value the fundamental contributions women are making to the field of soil science in scientific research and in broader impacts including science education and communication, land management and restoration, Indigenous engagement, community outreach, and best data practices. We know that the critical intersections between research and diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts will pave the way for more diverse perspectives and enhanced representation in our field, while advancing the next generation of scientific thought. At times, our efforts have been met with resistance. We’ve even been told that “we got it wrong” by incorrectly defining leaders who didn’t fit in the established model. We see these challenges as a sign of the impact we’re having in shifting the status quo and making space for new definitions of success. It also reminds us that despite the substantial progress and opportunity for women in our field, there’s still more work to do. In closing, we want all women, both in our network and beyond, to ask for more: more money, more time off, more meaningful and healthy relationships with their work, and more space to be human when perfection often seems the standard. This requires more than just a mentor, but rather a network of people committed to ensuring we all get more of what we need. This fall, we are hosting an event on negotiating salaries and benefits for early career women. So many of our members have been asking for this training because we have not been taught how to ask for more. Our hope is that WiSE members will continue to learn from our shared experiences, break the mold of what’s expected, and further reshape the field of soil ecology into the equitable community of which we all want to be a part.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».