Readiness of Health Professionals, Undergraduate Medical Curriculum and on-the-job Training on Noncommunicable Diseases in Bangladesh to achieve Program Objectives- an Operational Research Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Health professionals need competency in the assessment and outcome evaluation of several health behaviors related to NCDs and their risk factors. Assessment of the curricula in health professional education programs with respect to health promotion competencies is a compelling and potentially costeffective initial means of preventing and reversing the trend of non-communicable diseases. Learning evidence-based health promotion competencies within an inter-professional context would help students maximize the use of nonpharmacologic/ non-surgical approaches and the contribution of each member of the health team. This operational research study was initiated by Noncommunicable Disease Control Program (NCDC) of GOB to assess the readiness of the medical graduates to achieve the primary program objective “to reduce premature (40-69 years age group) death by 33% by the year 2030”. The program also wanted to review the existing undergraduate curriculum to determine the need for a change to achieve program objectives. The activity was delegated to Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons (BCPS), to develop the recommendations for the NCD program. The study was designed as a cross-sectional mixed-method study adopting both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data were obtained from new graduates (12 medical colleges’ public & private) and older graduates from the existing public healthcare services. In-depth interviews (IDI), Key informant interviews (KII) & opinion gathering workshops were adopted to collect qualitative data. Senior medical teachers teaching NCD subjects were included in the qualitative process. Quantitative data were analyzed by using SPSS 20.0. Qualitative data was audio-recorded and transcribed by the anthropologist team. The curriculum review was done manually by using content analysis of the whole curriculum. The total number of respondents for the quantitative survey was 678, new graduates 348 (51%), older graduates 330 (49%). Among older graduates, 178 (54%) had no previous training, and 152 (46%) received some form of on-the-job training on NCDs by the program. The 12 IDI, 7 KII and 4 workshops participated by 88 senior teachers participated in recommendations development. The knowledge of 4 major NCDs, four major risk factors, PEN, and contribution of death from major NCDs was incorrect, suggesting a lack of conceptual and contextual understanding of the NCD prevention and control program. Qualitative investigation & opinion of the teachers suggested a lack of awareness of teachers regarding the control program, revealing a lack of communication and coordination between the program and academia, and the present curriculum is inadequate for NCD learning by the students. It can be concluded that the existing curriculum is inadequate in terms of program orientation and necessary skills to achieve the program objectives. A structured training program using a training module covering the concept and content on prevention and control of NCDs in a country perspective is essential for the current graduates. Major NCD education in the existing curriculum requires to be urgently updated and could be best offered by using a teaching-learning module on major NCDs. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2022; 40: 95-105
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».