Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children born to mothers with infertility: a population-based cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
STUDY QUESTION: Is the risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increased in children born to mothers with infertility, or after receipt of fertility treatment, compared to mothers with unassisted conception? SUMMARY ANSWER: Infertility itself may be associated with ADHD in the offspring, which is not amplified by the use of fertility treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infertility, and use of fertility treatment, is common. The long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of a child born to a mother with infertility, including the risk of ADHD, remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This population-based cohort study comprised all singleton and multiple hospital births in Ontario, Canada, 2006-2014. Outcomes were assessed up to June 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Linked administrative datasets were used to capture all hospital births in Ontario, maternal health and pregnancy measures, fertility treatment and child outcomes. Included were all children born at ≥24 weeks gestation between 2006 and 2014, and who were alive at age 4 years. The main exposure was mode of conception, namely (i) unassisted conception (reference group), (ii) infertility without fertility treatment (history of an infertility consultation with a physician within 2 years prior to conception but no fertility treatment), (iii) ovulation induction (OI) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and (iv) IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The main outcome was a diagnosis of ADHD after age 4 years and assessed up to June 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for maternal age, income quintile, rurality, immigration status, smoking, obesity, parity, any drug or alcohol use, maternal history of mental illness including ADHD, pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus or chronic hypertension and infant sex. In addition, we performed pre-planned stratified analyses by mode of delivery (vaginal or caesarean delivery), infant sex, multiplicity (singleton or multiple), timing of birth (term or preterm <37 weeks) and neonatal adverse morbidity (absent or present). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The study included 925 488 children born to 663 144 mothers, of whom 805 748 (87%) were from an unassisted conception, 94 206 (10.2%) followed infertility but no fertility treatment, 11 777 (1.3%) followed OI/IUI and 13 757 (1.5%) followed IVF/ICSI. Starting at age 4 years, children were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-8) years. ADHD occurred among 7.0% of offspring in the unassisted conception group, 7.5% in the infertility without fertility treatment group, 6.8% in the OI/IUI group and 6.3% in the IVF/ICSI group. The incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) of ADHD was 12.0 among children in the unassisted conception group, 12.8 in the infertility without fertility treatment group, 12.9 in the OI/IUI group and 12.2 in the IVF/ICSI group. Relative to the unassisted conception group, the adjusted HR for ADHD was 1.19 (95% CI 1.16-1.22) in the infertility without fertility treatment group, 1.09 (95% CI 1.01-1.17) in the OI/IUI group and 1.12 (95% CI 1.04-1.20) in the IVF/ICSI group. In the stratified analyses, these patterns of risk for ADHD were largely preserved. An exception was seen in the sex-stratified analyses, wherein females had lower absolute rates of ADHD but relatively higher HRs compared with that seen among males. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some mothers in the isolated infertility group may have received undocumented OI oral therapy, thereby leading to possible misclassification of their exposure status. Parenting behaviour, schooling and paternal mental health measures were not known, leading to potential residual confounding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Infertility, even without treatment, is a modest risk factor for the development of ADHD in childhood. The reason underlying this finding warrants further study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was made possible with funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Grant number PJT 165840. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».