Ecological economics and health: introducing an emerging literature
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We were delighted to see the recent publication in The Lancet Planetary Health by Lina Brand-Correa and colleagues,1Brand-Correa L Brook A Büchs M Meier P Naik Y O'Neill DW Economics for people and planet-moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm.Lancet Planet Health. 2022; 6: e371-e379Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar with its discussion of the great potential for ecological economics to connect with and inform public and planetary health. The authors did not, however, discuss the nascent but rapidly expanding research literature that has explicitly applied ecological and heterodox economics approaches to public health and health care. Ecological economists have themselves acknowledged that the broader social sphere, and especially human health and especially human caring work, has not received sufficient attention within the field, and have set out to address this deficit. Some have started to explore the crucial interconnectedness between patterns of overconsumption that damage human and planetary health and the harms of overconsumption of health care, and their association with “uneconomic growth”.2Hensher M Canny B Zimitat C Campbell J Palmer A Health care, overconsumption and uneconomic growth: a conceptual framework.Soc Sci Med. 2020; 266113420Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Other areas of focus examine the ways in which economic privatisation stunts ethical and effective response to public health crises,3Hensher M Kish K Farley J Quilley S Zywert K Open knowledge commons versus privatized gain in a fractured information ecology: lessons from COVID-19 for the future of sustainability.Global Sustainability. 2020; 3: e26Crossref Scopus (8) Google Scholar the implications of post-growth ecological macroeconomic models for public health, health-care, and social care systems,4Corlet Walker C Druckman A Jackson T Welfare systems without economic growth: a review of the challenges and next steps for the field.Ecol Econ. 2021; 186107066Crossref Scopus (5) Google Scholar and the challenges and opportunities that a post-growth or a degrowth economic paradigm might pose in these sectors.5Borowy I Aillon J-L Sustainable health and degrowth: health, health care and society beyond the growth paradigm.Soc Theory Health. 2017; 15: 346-368Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar We wholeheartedly agree with Brand-Correa and colleagues’ proposition that ecological and pluralist economics approaches offer opportunities to build a society that centres on health and the environment.1Brand-Correa L Brook A Büchs M Meier P Naik Y O'Neill DW Economics for people and planet-moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm.Lancet Planet Health. 2022; 6: e371-e379Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar We hope that this Correspondence provides a point of entry for readers to some of the available work that has already begun to explore this potential, and to further stimulate development in this important space. MH declares payment or honoraria from University of Bayreuth for teaching and from Novartis SA Brazil for a presentation at the Novartis Access Conference 2021; being a member of the ministerial advisory board of the South Australian Health Performance Council; and being a board member (unpaid) for Glenview Community Services Tasmania. KK declares no competing interests. Economics for people and planet—moving beyond the neoclassical paradigmDespite substantial attention within the fields of public and planetary health on developing an economic system that benefits both people's health and the environment, heterodox economic schools of thought have received little attention within these fields. Ecological economics is a school of thought with particular relevance to public and planetary health. In this article, we discuss implications of key ecological economics ideas for public and planetary health, especially those related to critiques of gross domestic product as a measure of progress and economic growth as the dominant goal for economic and policy decision making. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».