Experiences and Perceived Outcomes of a Grocery Gift Card Program for Low-Income Households at Risk of Food Insecurity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Household food insecurity negatively affects children's diet quality, physical and mental health, and academic performance. I Can for Kids’ (IC4K) grocery gift card (GGC) program provides GGC to low-income households with school-aged children at risk of household food insecurity in Calgary, Canada. This study described program recipients’ and facilitators’ experiences and perceived outcomes of accessing or facilitating IC4K's GGC program. This study used qualitative descriptive methodology. Data generation and analysis were guided by Freedman et al's theoretical framework of nutritious food access. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between August and November 2020 with 37 program recipients and 17 program facilitators who were purposively recruited. Directed content analysis was used to analyze the data using a deductive-inductive approach. Codes were combined into subthemes and themes that summarized program recipients’ and facilitators’ experiences and perceived outcomes of receiving or distributing GGC, and suggestions to improve IC4K's GGC program. Three themes were generated from the data: 1) IC4K's GGC program promoted a sense of autonomy and dignity among program recipients; 2) recipients used GGC to purchase foods that improved household dietary patterns and food skills, including foods that aligned with health-related food needs and cultural foodways and; 3) program logistical strengths and limitations, including the program's impact on facilitators’ connection with clients and their workload, experiences of differential access to GGC among recipients, and the importance of increasing program awareness to reach more food insecure households. IC4K's GGC program enhanced recipients’ access to nutritious foods, had positive impacts on household finances and diet quality, as well as recipients’ social health and emotional wellbeing. However, differential access to GGC among recipients was also identified. Study findings were used to inform three recommendations to improve IC4K's GGC program: 1) increase the number of GGC that recipients can receive; 2) establish concrete guidelines governing GGC distribution and; 3) increase program awareness. O'Brien Institute for Public Health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».