Adopting a Less Healthy Lifestyle Pattern During the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Modulated by Body Image Dissatisfaction and Increased Stress in Adults of the Canadian COVIDiet Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns may impact lifestyle behaviors including eating habits and physical activity; few studies identified emerging patterns of such changes and associated risk factors. Objectives were to identify patterns of weight and lifestyle behavior change resulting from the pandemic in Canadian adults; and potential risk factors. Analyses were conducted on 1,609 adults (18–89 y; 90.1% women; 81.8% White) of the Canadian COVIDiet study baseline data (May-Dec 2020). Self-reported current and pre-pandemic weight, physical activity, smoking status, perceived eating habits, alcohol intake and sleep quality were collected by online questionnaires. Based on these 6 indicator variables, categorized into 3–5 levels of change, latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify lifestyle behavior change patterns. Associations with potential risk factors including age, gender, ethnicity, education, income, chronic diseases, body image perception, and changes in stress level, living situation and work arrangement were examined with logistic regressions. Participants’ mean BMI was 26.8 ± 6.7; 61% had > = bachelor's degree. Since the pandemic, 21% could not always afford balanced meals, 35% had decreased income and 49% changed work arrangement. From LCA, 2 classes of lifestyle behavior change emerged; “healthy” and “less healthy” (probability: 0.58 and 0.42; BIC = 19,354.8, entropy = 5.5). “Healthy” class participants more frequently reported unchanged weight, sleep quality, smoking and alcohol intake, unchanged/improved eating habits and increased physical activity. The “less healthy” class reported significant weight gain, deteriorated eating habits and sleep quality, unchanged/increased alcohol intake and smoking, and decreased physical activity. Among risk factors, body image dissatisfaction [OR = 12.2, 95%CI (9.4–15.8)] and increased stress level [(OR = 5.0, 95%CI (3.8, 6.4)] were associated with adopting “less healthy” behaviors in adjusted models. The COVID-19 pandemic appeared to have influenced lifestyle behaviors unfavorably in some but favorably in others. Body image perception and change in stress level may have modulated these changes; whether these will sustain overtime remains to be studied. McGill University.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».