Does switching between high frequency rTMS and theta burst stimulation improve depression outcomes?

We read with interest recent articles in Brain Stimulation, reporting on the antidepressant effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) applied in accelerated schedules [[1]Blumberger D.M. Vila-Rodriguez F. Wang W. Knyahnytska Y. Butterfield M. Noda Y. et al.A randomized sham controlled comparison of once vs twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression: a Canadian rTMS treatment and biomarker network in depression (CARTBIND) study.Brain Stimul. 2021; 14: 1447-1455Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar,[2]Wu G.-R. Baeken C. Individual interregional perfusion between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation targets and the subgenual anterior cortex predicts response and remission to aiTBS treatment in medication-resistant depression: the influence of behavioral inh.Brain Stimul. 2022; 15: 182-189Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar] and the efficacy comparison between unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approaches [[3]Aaronson S.T. Carpenter L.L. Hutton T.M. Kraus S. Mina M. Pages K. et al.Comparison of clinical outcomes with left unilateral and sequential bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment of major depressive disorder in a large patient registry.Brain Stimul. 2022; 15: 326-336Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar]. We recently reported a multisite randomized controlled trial comparing the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated bilateral TBS applied at 80% or 120% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) and left-sided 10 Hz rTMS applied at 120% RMT [[4]Chen L. Thomas E.H. Kaewpijit P. Miljevic A. Hughes R. Hahn L. et al.Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial.Brain Stimul. 2021; Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (10) Google Scholar]. The increasing evidence base supporting TBS's antidepressant effects has seen it gain acceptance as an alternative to standard left-sided 10 Hz rTMS in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Little is known whether TRD patients who do not experience antidepressant benefits with a standard course of rTMS might do so with a subsequent course of TBS, or vice-versa. Given that approximately 60–80% of patients who undergo a course of left-sided 10 Hz rTMS can expect to experience depression treatment response [[3]Aaronson S.T. Carpenter L.L. Hutton T.M. Kraus S. Mina M. Pages K. et al.Comparison of clinical outcomes with left unilateral and sequential bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment of major depressive disorder in a large patient registry.Brain Stimul. 2022; 15: 326-336Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar,[5]Sackeim H.A. Aaronson S.T. Carpenter L.L. Hutton T.M. Mina M. Pages K. et al.Clinical outcomes in a large registry of patients with major depressive disorder treated with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.J Affect Disord. 2020; 277: 65-74Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar], this is a clinically relevant knowledge gap for which minimal evidence-based guidance exists. One way to address this is to evaluate non-responders’ treatment outcomes to a crossover course of the alternate stimulation protocol. To our knowledge, such a crossover study has not been reported. We report the treatment outcomes of participants from our study [[4]Chen L. Thomas E.H. Kaewpijit P. Miljevic A. Hughes R. Hahn L. et al.Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial.Brain Stimul. 2021; Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (10) Google Scholar] who did not achieve treatment response from an initial course of left-sided 10 Hz rTMS or accelerated bilateral TBS, who then underwent an elective crossover course of the other rTMS modality. Of 300 consenting participants, 299 were randomized to one of two accelerated bilateral TBS treatment arms (24,000 pulses over 20 sessions across 10 days) or to the 10 Hz rTMS arm (60,000 pulses over 20 sessions across 4 weeks). Details of the study protocol are previously described [[4]Chen L. Thomas E.H. Kaewpijit P. Miljevic A. Hughes R. Hahn L. et al.Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial.Brain Stimul. 2021; Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (10) Google Scholar]. More than 80% (252/300) of participants completed the initial treatment course (rTMS or TBS) and week 4 assessment. Elective crossover to accelerated bilateral TBS applied at 120% RMT or left-sided 10 Hz rTMS were offered to 142 participants identified as non-responders (Supplementary Fig. S1). Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% reduction of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Clinician Rated Version (QIDS-C16) score from baseline to week 4 assessment, while depression remission was defined by achieving a QIDS-C16 score of ≤5 [[6]Rush A.J. Trivedi M.H. Ibrahim H.M. Carmody T.J. Arnow B. Klein D.N. et al.The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.Biol Psychiatr. 2003; 54: 573-583Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2510) Google Scholar]. The elective crossover phase was discussed with study participants at the time of obtaining informed consent and revisited with treatment non-responders at the week 8 review of the initial course. This gap of at least 4-weeks between completion of the initial rTMS/TBS course and the re-assessment of baseline depression severity prior to starting the crossover course sought to minimise carryover treatment effects from the initial to the crossover course. To investigate antidepressant response to accelerated bilateral TBS following non-response to left-sided 10 Hz rTMS, the proportion of responders to crossover TBS was descriptively considered with reference to the initial rTMS responder proportion of 0%, and vice-versa for non-responders to TBS who underwent crossover 10 Hz rTMS. Mean, standard deviation, median and range of QIDS-C16 at baseline timepoints for the initial and crossover treatment courses within each sequence arm (rTMS to TBS and TBS to rTMS) were inspected for carryover effects. Continuous summary statistics were calculated using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp) to characterize depression symptom severity of sequence arms at baseline and week 4 timepoints and within-arm percentage change. The study was approved by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee and registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Trial ID: 12617001443381. We found that three of eight (38%) non-responders to initial 10 Hz rTMS that crossed over to accelerated bilateral TBS treatment subsequently achieved response status. Two of eight (25%) achieved remission status. Two of ten (20%) non-responders to initial accelerated bilateral TBS achieved response and remission status to crossover 10 Hz rTMS (Supplementary Fig. S1). QIDS-C16 summary statistics for each arm are presented in Table 1.Table 1Descriptive statistics and percentage change of QIDS-C16 scores over initial and crossover treatment courses.Left-sided 10 Hz rTMS non-responders crossed over to accelerated bilateral TBSMean QIDS-C16 (SD)Median QIDS-C16Range of QIDS-C16Mean % QIDS-C16 change (SD)Median % QIDS-C16 changeRange of % QIDS-C16 changePre-rTMS baseline (n = 8)16.38 (2.33)16.0[13, 20]N/AN/AN/APost-rTMS week 4 (n = 8)12.88 (5.11)12.5[8, 24]−22.93 (22.00)−27.21[-40, 26]Pre-crossover accelerated TBS baseline (n = 8)15.13 (3.64)14.0[10, 21]N/AN/AN/APost-crossover accelerated TBS week 4 (n = 8)10.38 (6.14)9.5[3, 20]−25.16 (56.00)−32.05[-84, 100]Accelerated bilateral TBS non-responders crossed over to left-sided 10 Hz rTMSMean QIDS-C16 (SD)Median QIDS-C16Range of QIDS-C16Mean % QIDS-C16 change (SD)Median % QIDS-C16 changeRange of % QIDS-C16 changePre-accelerated TBS baseline (n = 10)17.40 (2.46)17.0[12, 21]N/AN/AN/APost-accelerated TBS week 4 (n = 10)13.80 (2.66)13.5[11, 20]−19.79 (15.10)−20.59[−45, 5]Pre-crossover rTMS baseline (n = 10)16.20 (3.46)15.5[12, 22]N/AN/AN/APost-crossover rTMS week 4 (n = 10 with 1 LOCF)12.6 (6.47)12.5[4, 21]−22.95 (37.29)−25.00[−76, 54] Open table in a new tab Considering the posited distinctions by which TBS and standard rTMS influence neuronal excitability [[7]Suppa A. Huang Y.Z. Funke K. Ridding M.C. Cheeran B. Di Lazzaro V. et al.Ten years of theta burst stimulation in humans: established knowledge, unknowns and prospects.Brain Stimul. 2016; 9: 323-335Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (265) Google Scholar,[8]Chen L. Chung S.W. Hoy K.E. Fitzgerald P.B. Is theta burst stimulation ready as a clinical treatment for depression?.Expert Rev Neurother. 2019; 19: 1089-1102Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar], it is reasonable to suggest there is difference in their antidepressant effects, although little is known whether 10 Hz rTMS and TBS non-responders might respond to the alternate rTMS approach. We believe this is the first report of depression treatment outcomes of crossover left-sided 10 Hz rTMS and bilateral TBS in TRD patients who did not respond to the other rTMS modality. We observed that depression treatment response can be achieved following crossover but only in a modest number of participants. This may be attributable to the chronicity and treatment-refractoriness of our participants [[4]Chen L. Thomas E.H. Kaewpijit P. Miljevic A. Hughes R. Hahn L. et al.Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial.Brain Stimul. 2021; Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (10) Google Scholar], who have also not responded to an initial course of TBS or rTMS. The data suggests that response may be more likely when switching from 10 Hz rTMS to accelerated bilateral TBS rather than the opposite. The exploratory nature of this study warrants caution in the interpretation of our findings. The sample size is small. Due to the elective basis on which non-responders proceeded to crossover treatment, results may be prone to volunteer bias. Similarly, treatment expectation bias may have been present in participants who did not achieve depression treatment response with the initial rTMS/TBS course and were keen to trial the alternative treatment. Conversely, few initial treatment non-responders elected to proceed to treatment crossover, resulting in reduced power in the crossover phase of the trial. Whilst most participants received concomitant antidepressant therapy, we ensured all participants' antidepressant regimes were unchanged for at least four weeks prior to and during their treatment courses. However, this also meant initial non-responders who underwent antidepressant changes and/or dose increases as part of their clinical treatment became ineligible for the crossover phase of the study. Additionally, it was possible for psychosocial circumstances to have changed for some participants, potentially confounding treatment outcomes. Lastly, although the minimum 4-week gap between the initial and crossover treatment courses was introduced to minimise carryover treatment effects from the first to the second course of treatment, it is recognized that this delay in the provision of an alternate treatment approach may not reflect typical clinical management of TRD. Notwithstanding, this study provides preliminary observation that depression treatment response to bilateral TBS or 10 Hz rTMS is possible following an unsuccessful initial course of the other. Future trial protocols that instigate crossover treatment for all non-responders (instead of elective crossover) can help increase study sample sizes and reduce the aforementioned limitations. Introducing an active control arm alongside the crossover arm in which participants receive a repeat course of the initial rTMS/TBS modality would allow more robust investigation into whether response to further treatment is attributable to the alternate modality or the reintroduction of the same treatment over a longer period, seeing as evidence supports the antidepressant efficacy of treatment continuation with both rTMS [[9]George M.S. Lisanby S.H. Avery D. McDonald W.M. Durkalski V. Pavlicova M. et al.Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial.Arch Gen Psychiatr. 2010; 67: 507-516Crossref PubMed Scopus (681) Google Scholar] and electroconvulsive therapy [[10]Sackeim H.A. Prudic J. Devanand D.P. Nobler M.S. Haskett R.F. Mulsant B.H. et al.The benefits and costs of changing treatment technique in electroconvulsive therapy due to insufficient improvement of a major depressive episode.Brain Stimul. 2020; 13: 1284-1295Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar]. Identification of clinical factors and biomarkers that inform probability of treatment response to a crossover rTMS/TBS course can further inform the utility of this promising treatment strategy. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: In the last 3 years PBF has received equipment for research from Nexstim and Brainsway Ltd. He is a founder of TMS Clinics Australia and Resonance Therapeutics. KEH is a founder of Resonance Therapeutics. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors would like to thank the patients, whose participation was essential for the successful completion of this study. We thank all of the clinical and administrative staff at the study centres for their invaluable assistance with participant coordination, assessment and treatment provision. We would also like to acknowledge the support of Epworth HealthCare and Ramsay Health Care (SA). This work received funding support from the Epworth Medical Foundation (Researcher Capacity Building Grant) and the Blue Sky Foundation. PBF is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Award (1193596). KEH is supported by a NHMRC Fellowship (1135558). The following is the supplementary data related to this article: Download .docx (.21 MB) Help with docx files Multimedia component 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.