Abstract 2021: Wilms tumor and pure erythroid leukemia arising from the same clone in an adolescent
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Wilms tumor and pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) are distinct malignancies arising from different tissues. Here we describe a case of an adolescent with a constitutional pathogenic BRCA2 variant who was diagnosed with a Wilms tumor and developed PEL while undergoing treatment. We provide evidence that both malignancies are distinct and arose from the same clone. A 16-year-old boy presented with a diffusely anaplastic Wilms tumor metastatic to liver. He was treated with radical nephrectomy, partial hepatectomy, radiation, and multiagent chemotherapy. Six months into treatment he developed new lung and liver lesions along with cytopenias. A bone marrow aspirate confirmed a diagnosis of PEL. His disease progressed after one cycle of myeloid leukemia-directed chemotherapy and he died of disease shortly after. Samples from his initial renal tumor, blood at Wilms tumor diagnosis, and diagnostic bone marrow for PEL were characterized by whole genome sequencing and RNA sequencing. Two sequence variants were shared in both tumors but were not found in the constitutional tissue (blood at first presentation): a promoter variant in TERT (c.-124C>T) and a missense variant in PDE4DIP (p.Gln1045His). Although neither variant has been reported in Wilms tumor or PEL, the TERT variant has been well described in other tumor types and is associated with decreased survival in some carcinomas. Both tumors also had pathogenic TP53 variants albeit a different one in each tumor (p.Arg175His in the Wilms tumor, p.Asp228* in PEL). Loss of heterozygosity at TP53 was present in both malignancies via copy number loss of 17p with a shared breakpoint. Furthermore, while both malignancies had complex and distinct karyotypes, 7p loss and 22q loss with identical breakpoints were present in both. None of these variants or copy number variants were present in constitutional tissue. RNA sequencing data confirmed the histologic finding that these were distinct malignancies as the expression patterns for each malignancy were consistent with previously published expression data for Wilms tumors and myeloid leukemias respectively. Although the patient had a constitutional pathogenic BRCA2 variant, loss of heterozygosity at that locus was not found in either tumor. Chromosome fragility testing for Fanconi anemia was uninterpretable due to the concomitant use of chemotherapeutic agents at the time of testing, however the patient had no phenotypic features to support this diagnosis. In this case there are multiple lines of evidence suggesting that a Wilms tumor and PEL arose from the same clone including shared TERT variants and copy number variant breakpoints. Kidney and hematopoietic tissue both arise from the embryonic mesoderm suggesting that the earliest alterations occurred in this tissue. The contribution of each shared pathogenic variant (TERT, BRCA2, 17p loss) to tumorigenesis and the role of chemotherapy in PEL development are still under investigation. Citation Format: Anita Villani, Winnie Lo, Yisu Li, Mohamed Abdelhaleem, Mary Shago, Federico Comitani, My Linh Thibodeau, Sarah Alexander, Uri Tabori, David Malkin, Adam Shlien, Jack Brzezinski. Wilms tumor and pure erythroid leukemia arising from the same clone in an adolescent [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2021.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».