MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4283316280 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2022.06.016

A pharmacovigilance study of terbinafine indication and liver enzyme elevation

2022· article· en· W4283316280 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAD International · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTerbinafinePharmacovigilanceAdverse Event Reporting SystemMedicineAdverse effectDatabaseMEDLINEInternal medicineDermatologyAntifungalComputer scienceItraconazole

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Terbinafine is a commonly administered oral and topical antifungal medication. Terbinafine oral treatment regimens are based on the site of infection; nail infections often require a 6 to 12-week treatment schedule, but non-nail (ie, skin or hair) infections can usually be treated for 2 to 6 weeks. While it is commonly regarded that terbinafine-induced liver injury occurs within 30 days,1Maxfield L, Preuss CV, Bermudez R. Terbinafine. [Updated 2021 Aug 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2022 January. Accessed July 14, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545218/Google Scholar we hypothesize that indications necessitating longer treatment durations are more likely associated with liver injury/liver enzyme elevation (LEE) events. To analyze this question, we computed a reporting odds ratios (ROR) using drug-event reports extracted from both the FDA Adverse Drug Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online (CVARO) databases. It is important to highlight that one of the limitations of these commonly used databases is that the data entered by physicians or pharmaceutical companies is not corroborated or confirmed independently. Raw database files were downloaded from: https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html (USA) and https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/adverse-reaction-database/canada-vigilance-online-database-data-extract.html. The FAERS database included reports logged between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. The CVARO database included all publicly available reports from 1965 to September 2021 inclusively. To capture all terbinafine-associated drug reports, we searched both databases using “%terbinafine%” and “%lamisil%” (% represents a wildcard modifier) terms. Additionally, we made sure to exclude topical terbinafine preparations from the search results. Adverse events are encoded in both databases using MedDRA’s list of accepted terminologies. There was a total of 21,034 and 3913 oral terbinafine-associated adverse drug reaction reports in both the FAERS and CVARO databases, respectively. Notably, 247 (FAERS) and 125 (CVARO) of these reports were related to LEE events. Unfortunately, the degree of LEE (eg, 2-fold vs. 100-fold) or its clinical significance is not detailed in the databases. Furthermore, details on other possible interacting medications that patients might be taking are not available from these sources. Following data extraction, the ROR, a classically accepted method of signal generation for common adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance studies, was computed.2Rothman K.J. Lanes S. Sacks S.T. The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004; 13: 519-523https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1001Google Scholar, 3Sakaeda T. Tamon A. Kadoyama K. Okuno Y. Data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Int J Med Sci. 2013; 10: 796-803https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6048Google Scholar Table I demonstrates the RORs for terbinafine and LEE events and is further stratified by indication. Isoniazid, a well-known hepatotoxic agent, was used as a comparator to better contextualize the magnitude of terbinafine-LEE associated RORs.Table IROR for terbinafine-LEE reports according to indicationVariables assessedFAERS ROR (CI)CVARO ROR (CI)Terbinafine-LEE ReportsNon-Onychomycosis1.71 (1.07-2.72)1.51 (0.37-6.09)Terbinafine-LEE ReportsNail Infections4.58 (3.84-5.46)4.51 (2.64-7.68)Isoniazid-LEE Reports5.35 (5.06-5.67)5.51 (5.00-6.07)RORs are listed for terbinafine and onychomycosis and non-onychomycosis indications. In brackets are each ROR’s confidence intervals. FDA adverse event reporting system and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online RORs are listed in their respective columns.CVARO, Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online; FAERS, FDA Adverse Drug Event Reporting System; LEE, liver enzyme elevation; ROR, reporting odds ratio. Open table in a new tab RORs are listed for terbinafine and onychomycosis and non-onychomycosis indications. In brackets are each ROR’s confidence intervals. FDA adverse event reporting system and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online RORs are listed in their respective columns. CVARO, Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online; FAERS, FDA Adverse Drug Event Reporting System; LEE, liver enzyme elevation; ROR, reporting odds ratio. Terbinafine-LEE RORs were more than 2-fold higher for onychomycosis versus non-onychomycosis (ie, skin and nail) infections in both FAERS and CVARO databases (Table I, Supplementary Table I, available via Mendeley at https://doi.org/10.17632/n8pkb4tzyz.1). Additionally, onychomycosis-indicated LEE RORs more closely approximated isoniazid-LEE RORs compared with non-onychomycosis-LEE RORs in both databases, possibly suggesting a greater likelihood of LEE and liver injury with longer terbinafine use. Our analysis suggests a possible relationship between liver injury and longer usage of terbinafine, which is comparable to that of isoniazid, where older patients undergo monthly blood tests to evaluate for this idiosyncratic event.4Gray E.L. Goldberg H.F. Baseline abnormal liver function tests are more important than age in the development of isoniazid-induced hepatoxicity for patients receiving preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection.Intern Med J. 2016; 46: 281-287https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12979Google Scholar As a result, we emphasize the importance of further investigating this potentially duration-sensitive adverse drug reaction, assessing its clinical significance and impact on patients to better direct clinicians in the safe prescribing of terbinafine in populations at higher risk of liver-related injuries and complications. None disclosed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,430
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,253

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle