MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4283660579 · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000001051

Pediatric Sport and Exercise Medicine: Eight Things Clinicians and Patients Should Question

2022· editorial· en· W4283660579 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Laura Purcell, Erika Persson, Kristin Houghton

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2022
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealthcare cost, quality, practices
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSports medicineHarmMEDLINEEvidence-based medicineAlternative medicineFamily medicineHealth carePhysical therapyPsychologyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Evidence-based medicine is what clinicians strive for when caring for their patients. It is “the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”1 A key component of evidence-based medicine is the judicious use of tests and treatments. Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) is a national campaign to help clinicians and patients make mutual decisions about appropriate management of health issues and to initiate discussions about unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures. Since 2014, CWC has partnered with numerous professional medical organizations and associations representing several clinical specialties to generate lists of “Things Clinicians and Patients Should Question.”2 The goal is to reduce the number of unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures that occur in Canada which potentially expose patients to harm, create unnecessary stress for patients and families, lead to more testing to evaluate false positives, and consume time and limited resources. Partnering with Choosing Wisely Canada, the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine (CASEM) has generated a pediatric SEM list of “Eight Things Clinicians and Patients Should Question”. This list was launched on April 12, 2022, on the Choosing Wisely and CASEM web sites.2,3 (EN: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendation/sport-and-exercise-medicine/#pediatric-sport-and-exercise-medicine FR: https://choisiravecsoin.org/recommendation/medecine-du-sport-et-de-lexercice/#medecine-sport-pediatriques). WHY A PEDIATRIC SEM LIST? Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints are common in the pediatric age group, accounting for up to 25% of primary care visits by adolescents.4 Two-thirds of all injuries in adolescents are related to sports participation and can result in hundreds of thousands of emergency room visits annually.5,6 Sport injuries in children and youth can have a significant negative impact on quality of life, sometimes requiring weeks to months of time away from sport and activity as well as physiotherapy or even surgery, particularly if these injuries are not appropriately identified and managed. These injuries can also result in school absence, negatively affecting academic achievement, and can cause children and adolescents to drop out of sports altogether, reducing physical activity levels in adolescence and into adulthood.7 Given the frequency of sport injuries in the pediatric age group, it is vital that all clinicians managing these issues in children and youth are aware of and apply the available evidence in their daily practices. Current lists on the Choosing Wisely Canada web site have very few pediatric-specific SEM or pediatric-specific MSK recommendations.2 CASEM has previously developed an SEM list but only one recommendation was specific to the pediatric population.8 We are addressing this gap with the new list. HOW THE LIST WAS DEVELOPED CASEM formed a small working group consisting of Drs Laura Purcell, Erika Persson, and Kristin Houghton, all pediatricians and sport medicine specialists, who identified a need to develop a list of recommendations specifically for pediatric SEM. This list was developed based on existing research, experience, and common practice patterns. We sought input from the Pediatric Interest Group of CASEM, as well as a pediatric orthopedic surgeon and a pediatric MSK radiologist at McMaster Children's Hospital. The general CASEM membership was also asked for their input by electronic survey. The Publications Committee of CASEM provided input before the list being approved by the CASEM Board. The list was then submitted to CWC, which approved it after their own internal review process. THE PEDIATRIC SEM LIST The Pediatric SEM list identifies investigations and practices commonly used in pediatric SEM/MSK assessments that are not supported by evidence and may expose patients to harm, unnecessary stress, and additional unnecessary testing, consuming time and constrained resources. The list includes 8 imaging and management recommendations for knee and shoulder injuries, back pain, scoliosis, distal radius buckle fractures, CT scans in minor head injuries/concussion, and management of chronic pain syndromes. The list can be accessed using the following links: EN: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendation/sport-and-exercise-medicine/#pediatric-sport-and-exercise-medicine. FR: https://choisiravecsoin.org/recommendation/medecine-du-sport-et-de-lexercice/#medecine-sport-pediatriques. CONCLUSION Evidence-based medicine is what we aspire to in our daily practices. We encourage all clinicians who see pediatric patients—family physicians, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, orthopedic surgeons, and SEM doctors—to adopt these CWC pediatric SEM recommendations as part of routine practice to optimize care for children and youth and minimize the use of unnecessary investigations and treatments.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,067
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,223

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,039
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0060,009
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0130,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0670,041

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,401
Tête enseignante GPT0,584
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Journal of Sport MedicineMême sujetHealthcare cost, quality, practicesTravaux en français237 207