P-187 Post-thaw embryo quality is not predictive of live birth rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question To determine whether post-thaw change in embryo quality is associated with live birth outcomes. Summary answer Post-thaw embryo morphology is not predictive of live birth rates in single frozen embryo transfer cycles. What is known already Embryo quality is typically evaluated via morphological assessment of embryos based on the Gardner criteria. For medical or elective reasons, embryos are commonly frozen for future use through the vitrification process. Research has shown that embryo quality pre-vitrification correlates highly with freeze-thaw survival, implantation, pregnancy, and subsequent live birth rates. Good-quality embryos are therefore more likely to be selected for vitrification. However, it is not unusual to find a decline in the quality of these vitrified embryos upon thawing them for embryo transfer. Study design, size, duration We retrospectively identified a patient cohort based out of the Ottawa Fertility Centre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, between 2016 and 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Frozen single embryo transfer (FET) cycles involving good-quality expanded blastocysts deriving from autologous oocytes were selected for inclusion. We compared FET cycles involving good post-thaw embryo quality to those with worsened/poor post-thaw embryo quality. The primary outcome was live birth after FET. Secondary outcomes included rates of positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin, clinical intrauterine pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy. We fit a multivariate logistic regression model, adjusting for patient and cycle characteristics. Main results and the role of chance A total of 962 single FET cycles were analyzed. There were 826 embryos that preserved their pre-vitrification quality post-thaw and 136 embryos that exhibited poorer quality on post-thaw assessment. Baseline characteristics were mostly comparable between the two groups under study. In the multivariate regression model, the adjusted odds of live birth was not significantly different in the group with good post-thaw embryo quality compared to that in the group with worse/poor post-thaw embryo quality (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.96, p = 0.21). Similarly, no significant associations were found between post-thaw embryo quality and the secondary outcomes of positive BhCG (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.81-1.75), clinical intrauterine pregnancy (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87-1.87), miscarriage (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.53-1.77), and ectopic pregnancy rates (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.14-1.24). Limitations, reasons for caution Although a multivariate regression model was used to adjust for clinically relevant confounders, there remains the possibility for residual confounding given the observational nature of our study. Wider implications of the findings The results of our study suggest that, after adjusting for patient and cycle characteristics, post-thaw embryo quality does not impact live birth outcomes. Trial registration number Not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».