Nursing role central to successful implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a global surgical quality improvement initiative that is now firmly embedded as a standard of care in numerous surgical disciplines and is gaining traction in several others.1.Ljungqvist O. de Boer H.D. Balfour A. et al.Opportunities and challenges for the next phase of enhanced recovery after surgery: A review.JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1; 156: 775-784Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar A key component required for the successful implementation of ERAS is the development of a multidisciplinary team comprised at a minimum of a surgeon, an anesthesiologist, and a nurse.2.Nelson G. Dowdy S.C. Lasala J. et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) in gynecologic oncology - practical considerations for program development.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec; 147: 617-620Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar It is important to select these individuals carefully, as they will be the ones carrying out the work and promoting the uptake of ERAS at their local institution. The importance of nursing, not only the ERAS nurse in the core ERAS team but also the nurses in the clinic, operating room, recovery room and ward, cannot be overemphasized as they perform the bulk of the day-to-day tasks of the enhanced recovery protocol.1.Ljungqvist O. de Boer H.D. Balfour A. et al.Opportunities and challenges for the next phase of enhanced recovery after surgery: A review.JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1; 156: 775-784Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar Nurses also play a central role in getting teams to iterate toward increasing ERAS adherence which has been shown in several studies to be associated with improved clinical outcomes.3.Wijk L. Udumyan R. Pache B. et al.International validation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society guidelines on enhanced recovery for gynecologic surgery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 237.e1-237.e11Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (61) Google Scholar,4.Gustafsson U.O. Hausel J. Thorell A. et al.Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.Arch Surg. 2011 May; 146: 571-577Crossref PubMed Scopus (547) Google Scholar Despite these efforts, many teams remain stalled at suboptimal ERAS adherence (< 70%) and lack of collaboration and communication between multidisciplinary team members has been identified as a major barrier.5.Kehlet H. Enhanced postoperative recovery: Good from Afar, but far from good?.Anaesthesia. 2020; 75: e54-e61https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14860Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar,6.Balfour A. Burch J. Fecher-Jones I. Carter F.J. Understanding the benefits and implications of enhanced recovery after surgery.Nurs Stand. 2019; 34: 70-75https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2019.e11437Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar Are nurses the answer to improved outcomes in ERAS? Several articles in this issue of the Journal highlight the unique role that the nurse plays in ERAS implementation. Jensen et al. performed a systematic review of efficacy of pre- and rehabilitation in radical cystectomy on health-related quality of life and physical function. While none of the included studies provided support that the interventions improved quality of life overall, the authors did find evidence that nursing led education in stoma care improved the self-efficacy significantly.7.Jensen BT, Thomsen T, Mohamed N, et al. Efficacy of pre and rehabilitation in radical cystectomy on health related quality of life and physical function: A systematic review. Asia-Pac J Oncol Nurs DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.008.Google Scholar Image-altering procedures such as stomas which are often employed in oncology surgeries (eg., urology, colorectal surgery, gynecologic oncology) require a thorough discussion with the patient, and this is often beyond the time allowable in clinic with the surgeon. This then falls to the experienced ERAS nurse who can explore the balance between therapeutic benefit and impact on quality of life for the patient. This is emphasized in Jensen et al's ERAS nursing perspective in radical cystectomy, which describes the increasingly important role of shared decision making in oncology care, where ERAS nurses help patients faced with difficult treatment decisions that require them to weigh efficacy, safety, and quality of life.8.Jensen BT, Retinger NL, Lauridsen SV. From fast-track to enhanced recovery after surgery in radical cystectomy pathways: A nursing perspective. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.010.Google Scholar Majumdar et al. from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center implemented an updated ERAS protocol in total mastectomy patients which included a 35% increase in total intravenous anesthesia usage and near elimination of ketorolac. These changes resulted in a statistically significant reduction in reoperation due to hematoma formation.9.Majumdar JR, Assel MJ, Lang SA, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in patients undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer: An interrupted time-series design. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.009.Google Scholar The authors attributed the protocol success to “use of effective feedback, communication, and teamwork translating to meaningful change in patient outcomes”.9.Majumdar JR, Assel MJ, Lang SA, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in patients undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer: An interrupted time-series design. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.009.Google Scholar In another study, Lu et al. aimed to develop an ERAS protocol for lung cancer surgery tailored to the Chinese national context and extended their study search to Chinese databases including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (Sinomed) and China Academic Journals (CNKI) among others.10.Lu Y, Yuan Z, Han Y, et al. Summary of best evidence for enhanced recovery after surgery for patients undergoing lung cancer operations. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.03.006.Google Scholar They are among the first to take this approach and contend that successful implementation of ERAS not only requires evidence-based practice but also must take into account the current status quo of the department and local patient conditions in order to develop a meaningful perioperative care plan. Undoubtedly, the successful outcomes seen in the ERAS mastectomy study9.Majumdar JR, Assel MJ, Lang SA, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in patients undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer: An interrupted time-series design. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.009.Google Scholar and the roll-out of the Chinese-tailored ERAS lung protocol10.Lu Y, Yuan Z, Han Y, et al. Summary of best evidence for enhanced recovery after surgery for patients undergoing lung cancer operations. Asia-Pac J Oncol DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.03.006.Google Scholar are reliant on the diligence of the ERAS nurse but also all nursing staff along the entire ERAS surgical care continuum as many of the ERAS recommendations relate to traditional nursing roles such as preoperative education, nutrition, mobilization, and analgesia. Finally, it is now established that nursing workload actually decreases with the increasing ERAS compliance,11.Hübner M. Addor V. Slieker J. et al.The impact of an enhanced recovery pathway on nursing workload: A retrospective cohort study.Int J Surg. 2015 Dec; 24: 45-50Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar mirroring the dose–response relationship seen with clinical outcomes (length of stay and complications) and ERAS compliance.3.Wijk L. Udumyan R. Pache B. et al.International validation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society guidelines on enhanced recovery for gynecologic surgery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 237.e1-237.e11Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (61) Google Scholar,4.Gustafsson U.O. Hausel J. Thorell A. et al.Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.Arch Surg. 2011 May; 146: 571-577Crossref PubMed Scopus (547) Google Scholar Because of this, one might assume that the roles and responsibilities of the ERAS nurse should be ever increasing. This is not the case, however, according to Balfour et al. who discuss that twenty-five years on, we are still seeing barriers to expansion of the ERAS nurse role in today's hospitals.12.Balfour A, Amery J, Burch J, Smid-Nanning H. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®): Barriers and solutions for nurses. Asia-Pac J Oncol Nurs DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.02.002.Google Scholar Barriers include poor nursing leadership, lack of engagement, poor communication, and lack of resources. Some nurses even fear reprisal for attempting to keep a patient on the ERAS pathway and question to what degree they will ever independently manage patients within the ERAS program. The answer will most likely vary from country to country but fortunately solutions to overcoming these barriers exist such as the inclusion of nursing in the ERAS Guidelines working groups and encouraging nurses to help generate the evidence base (research) that forms the backbone of the guidelines. Nursing is central to the successful implementation of ERAS. The nursing role will continue to evolve within the ERAS program just as the ERAS guidelines themselves change and as ERAS teams innovate toward improvements in clinical outcomes for patients and healthcare systems globally. None declared. Dr. Gregg Nelson is Professor and Chief of Gynecologic Oncology at the University of Calgary. His principal research interest is the development and study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols in cancer surgery. He holds the position of Surgical Lead, ERAS Alberta and is the Treasurer of the ERAS® Society.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».