MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4283753816 · doi:10.30978/unj2022-1-24

Assessment and prediction of affective disorders in patients after cerebral stroke using modern measurement scales

2022· article· en· W4283753816 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuriy Flomin, S. O. Malyarov, V. G. Guryanov, L. I. Sokolova

Notice bibliographique

RevueUkrainian Neurological Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentConfidence intervalStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleLogistic regressionHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleOdds ratioDepression (economics)AnxietyIntracerebral hemorrhageInternal medicinePhysical therapyIschemic strokeCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDiseaseSubarachnoid hemorrhageIschemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective — to analyze the results of scale‑based assessments of post‑stroke depression (PSD) and post‑stroke anxiety disorders (PSAD) in different phases of cerebral stroke (CS) as well as to determine independent predictors of PSD at discharge from the Stroke Center (StC), and to evaluate the characteristics of the respective predictive models. Methods and subjects. Two hundred patients, including 92 (46.0 %) women and 108 (54.0 %) men with the median age of 65.6 years (IQR 58.2 — 75.1) were enrolled. The health status of all patients was assessed after hospitalization using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, Mini‑Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). 172 (86.0 %) patients were diagnosed with ischemic stroke (IS), 28 (14.0 %) — intracerebral hemorrhage. Among patients with IS, 58 (33.7 %) had an atherothrombotic subtype, 85 (49.4 %) had a cardioembolic subtype, 16 (9.3 %) had a lacunar subtype, 13 (7.6 %) had another or unknown subtype. The PSD and PSAD were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‑9) before discharge from the Stroke Center. The impact of factors was assessed by odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI). The method of constructing and analyzing logistic regression models was used to determine independent predictors of PSD at discharge. Results. The baseline NIHSS score ranged from 1 to 29. The mRS scores upon admission were from 1 to 5, and the BI scores from 0 to 100. Forty‑one (20.5 %) patients were admitted in the hyperacute period, 55 (27.5 %) in the acute period, 68 (34.0 %) in the early subacute period, 13 (6.5 %) in the late subacute period, and 23 (11.5 %) in the chronic phase of stroke. The HADS‑D score ranged from 0 to 18, and the HADS‑A score from 0 to 15. PHQ‑9 scores ranged from 0 to 21. Based on the HADS score, 19 (9.5 %) of the patients had clinically significant PSD and 16 (8.0 %) of the participants had clinically significant PSAD. According to the total HADS score, 22 (11.0 %) of the patients had clinically significant affective disorders. With PHQ‑9 showed that clinically significant PSD was detected in 45 (22.5 %) patients. The HADS and PHQ‑9 scores had a strong positive significant correlation, but neither of them correlated with the age or sex of the patients, the subtype or severity of CS. However, univariate analysis showed that the risk of clinically significant PSD at discharge (according to HADS‑D) was significantly directly related to age and atrial fibrillation in addition to inverse relationship with the BI, MMSE and MoCA scores, LA subtype of IS and ICH. The risk of moderate to severe PSD (according to PHQ‑9) had a statistically significant direct corelation with the initial NIHSS score, as well as an inverse corelation with the baseline BI, MMSE, and MoCA scores. In multivariate analysis, 4 features were independently associated with PSD (HADS‑D > 10) at discharge: initial MMSE score (OR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.88 — 0.98, on average, for each additional point, p = 0.006), arterial hypertension (OR 8.5; 95 % CI 0.9 — 76.3; p = 0.057) or obesity (OR 0.23; 95 % CI 0.05 — 1.14; p = 0.072) as well as hospitalization after 30 days from CS onset. The predictive model based on these 4 variables had excellent sensitivity (94.7 %) and satisfactory specificity (73.3 %) and could assess the risk of developing PSD with good accuracy (AUC = 0.847). Furthermore, three factors were independent predictors of moderate or severe PSD (PHQ‑9 > 9) at discharge: age (OR 1.04; 95 % CI 1.00 — 1.08, on average, for each additional year, p = 0.028), the baseline MoCA score (OR 0.94; 95 % CI 0.91 — 0.98, on average, with an increase in the score for each additional point, p = 0.005) and UN subtype of IS. The prognostic model based on the latter 3 variables had satisfactory sensitivity (65.1 %) and specificity (75.5 %), but good accuracy of PSD prediction (AUC = 0.735). Conclusions. The HADS and PHQ‑9 scores in CS patients varied widely, and indicated high prevalence of clinically significant PSD and PSAD. HADS and PHQ‑9 scores correlated with each other, but not with age, sex, subtype, or severity of stroke. Elderly patients with significant cognitive impairment on admission were at a higher risk of affective disorders. The prognostic models allow accurate PSD prediction, which can contribute to the timely detection and initiation of PSD treatment in patients at risk.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,489

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUkrainian Neurological JournalMême sujetAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementTravaux en français237 207