Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a combined treatment of insulin glargine and propylene glycol on the resolution of hyperketonemia and milk production in postpartum dairy cows
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Multiple treatments for hyperketonemia have been studied, and although propylene glycol has been the most constantly reported as successful in mitigating the effects of this condition, a recent study showed that a subpopulation of cows affected by hyperketonemia and hypoglycemia could benefit from a combined treatment of propylene glycol and insulin glargine. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of this combination on the time-to-hyperketonemia resolution, and on milk production following the initial treatment. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 2 commercial farms on which postpartum exams were conducted twice a week. Cows naturally affected by both hyperketonemia [β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) ≥ 1.4 mmol/L] and hypoglycemia (glucose <2.2 mmol/L) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive 2 mL of placebo (physiological saline) subcutaneously (PBO), or to receive 2 mL of insulin glargine (200 IU) subcutaneously (INS). Cows in both groups also received 300 g of propylene glycol orally for 3 d. Time-to-hyperketonemia resolution (return to BHB <1.4 mmol/L) and daily milk production following the initial treatment were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazard and mixed linear regression models, respectively. A total of 248 cows between 1 and 30 d in milk (median = 16) were enrolled in the trial from January 2018 to February 2022. Cows were of first (32.3%; n = 80/248), second (32.3%; n = 80/248), or third or greater (35.4%; n = 88/248) parity. The overall time-to-hyperketonemia resolution was not different between treatments, but there was a 2-way interaction between treatment group and parity. Primiparous cows had a shorter time-to-resolution in the INS group than in the PBO group; no difference was observed between treatment groups for older cows. The overall milk production of cows in the INS group was 3.4 kg higher than cows in the PBO group during the 14 d after enrollment. There was a 2-way interaction between treatment group and parity. Primiparous cows in the INS group produced 5.3 kg more milk daily than primiparous cows in the PBO group; no effect of treatment was found for older cows. These results suggest that cows affected simultaneously by hyperketonemia and hypoglycemia benefited from a combined treatment of propylene glycol and insulin glargine to improve subsequent milk production and that the effect primarily came from the positive effect in primiparous cows. Time-to-hyperketonemia resolution was also improved in primiparous cows but not in older cows.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».