Health Outcomes Associated With Having an Oophorectomy Versus Retaining One's Ovaries for Transmasculine and Gender Diverse Individuals Treated With Testosterone Therapy: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: The transmasculine and gender diverse (TMGD) spectrum includes transgender men and non-binary individuals whose sex was assigned female at birth. Many TMGD patients pursue treatment with exogenous testosterone to acquire masculine characteristics. Some may choose to undergo gynecological gender-affirming surgery for total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy (TH/BSO). The decision to retain or remove the ovaries in the setting of chronic testosterone therapy has implications on reproductive health, oncologic risk, endocrine management, cardiovascular health, bone density and neurocognitive status. However, there is limited evidence on the long-term outcomes from this intervention. OBJECTIVE: Here we review health-related outcomes of oophorectomy in TMGD population treated with chronic testosterone therapy in order to guide clinicians and patients in the decision to retain or remove their ovaries. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published prior to October 26, 2021 that: (i) included transgender men/TMGD individuals in the study populations; (ii) were full-text randomized controlled studies, case reports, case series, retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, qualitative studies, and cross-sectional studies; and (iii) specifically discussed ovaries, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, ovariectomy, or gonadectomy. RESULTS: We identified 469 studies, of which 39 met our inclusion criteria for this review. Three studies discussed fertility outcomes, 11 assessed histopathological changes to the ovaries, 6 discussed ovarian oncological outcomes, 8 addressed endocrine considerations, 3 discussed cardiovascular health outcomes, and 8 discussed bone density. No studies were found that examined surgical outcomes or neurocognitive changes. CONCLUSION: There is little information to guide TMGD individuals who are considering TH/BSO versus TH/BS with ovarian retention. Our review suggests that there is limited evidence to suggest that fertility preservation is successful after TH/BS with ovarian retention. Current evidence does not support regular reduction in testosterone dosing following oophorectomy. Estradiol levels are likely higher in individuals that choose ovarian retention, but this has not been clearly demonstrated. Although bone mineral density decreases following oophorectomy, data demonstrating an increased fracture risk are lacking. No studies have described the specific impact on neurocognitive function, or changes in operative complications. Further research evaluating long-term health outcomes of oophorectomy for TMGD individuals treated with chronic testosterone therapy is warranted to provide comprehensive, evidence-based healthcare to this patient population. Sahil Kumar, Smita Mukherjee, Cormac O'Dwyer, et al. Health Outcomes Associated With Having an Oophorectomy Versus Retaining One's Ovaries for Transmasculine and Gender Diverse Individuals Treated With Testosterone Therapy: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:636-647.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».