Blood delivery by drone: a faltering step in a promising direction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We read with great interest the Article in The Lancet Global Health by Marie Paul Nisingizwe and colleagues, which showed the value of drone blood delivery in terms of reducing delivery time and blood component wastage in hospitals in Rwanda, where 83% of residents live in rural areas.1Nisingizwe MP Ndishimye P Swaibu K et al.Effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) delivery on blood product delivery time and wastage in Rwanda: a retrospective, cross-sectional study and time series analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2022; 10: e564-e569Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar The authors found that 14 of 20 hospitals studied delivered blood faster by drone than by car, but in three hospitals the difference between the two delivery systems was less than 5 min, and in three other hospitals, drone deliveries were slower, with the largest time difference being 34 min. These results were not discussed. This phenomenon was also observed in urban areas. In March, 2021, we implemented a rotor-wing drone blood delivery system in Hangzhou, a city in eastern China with a population of 12 million people. After collecting 9 months of operational data, we found that blood products delivered by drones reduced delivery time by 50%, but some drone deliveries took 10% longer than those made by car. There might be multiple reasons for this finding. First, commercially available rotor-wing drones have a maximum range of less than 20 km, requiring battery replacement at relay points. The time advantage weakens as the number of relays increases for a longer flight distance. If the drone is to fly over a river, additional battery replacement before or after the crossing is to be expected to anticipate slower speed and increased power consumption in stronger headwinds. Second, various factors, such as avoiding airports and railway stations, densely populated areas, nature heritage reserves, and high-rise buildings, prevent the drone from flying in a straight line, sometimes making the flight distance greater than the ground distance. For economic reasons, different air routes must share the same relay points, which extends the distance of some flights. Finally, in urban areas, the comparison of delivery times must consider the traffic situation, and the time savings from drones could be greater in cities with more congested traffic. Blood delivery by drone has the advantage of being fast and safe, and unaffected by uneven roads and traffic jams.2Homier V Brouard D Nolan M et al.Drone versus ground delivery of simulated blood products to an urban trauma center: the Montreal Medi-Drone pilot study.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021; 90: 515-521Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar, 3Amukele T Ness PM Tobian AA Boyd J Street J Drone transportation of blood products.Transfusion. 2017; 57: 582-588Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar However, to achieve the desired goals, certain conditions must be met. Pending the advancement of drone technology, the exploration and gradual integration of different scenarios, such as the geographical distribution of hospitals in a city, air and ground itineraries and road conditions, cost-effectiveness,4Zailani MA Azma RZ Aniza I et al.Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 211308Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar and so on, would enable the implementation of a citywide drone medical logistics system in the near future. We declare no competing interests. Effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) delivery on blood product delivery time and wastage in Rwanda: a retrospective, cross-sectional study and time series analysisWe found that drone delivery led to faster delivery times and less blood component wastage in health facilities. Future studies should investigate if these improvements are cost-effective, and whether drone delivery might be effective for other pharmaceutical and health supplies that cannot be easily stored at remote facilities. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».