MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4285369244 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2021.0036

Robert Chambers of Edinburgh: Victorian Polymath and Educator by Iris Macfarlane and Alan Macfarlane

2021· article· en· W4285369244 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebekah Greene

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Historical and Scientific Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolymathBiographyArt historyClassicsHistoryArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Robert Chambers of Edinburgh: Victorian Polymath and Educator by Iris Macfarlane and Alan Macfarlane Rebekah Greene (bio) Iris Macfarlane with Alan Macfarlane, Robert Chambers of Edinburgh: Victorian Polymath and Educator (New York: Routledge, 2021), pp. xiv + 350, $160/£120 hardcover, $48.95/£36.99 e-book. Robert Chambers of Edinburgh is a fascinating biographical study of one of nineteenth-century Scotland’s most interesting thinkers. Today, Chambers (1802–71) is most remembered by scholars of literature as one of the founders of Chambers’s Edinburgh Journal and by science historians as an early evolutionary thinker and the author of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844). Chambers was also a prolific writer with interests in folklore, biography, geology, and social reform whose work was read with interest by many, including well-known figures such as Prince Albert, Benjamin Disraeli, and Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Chambers’s story is one of hard work and perseverance. After years of selling used books, he eventually leveraged his connections in the Edinburgh publishing world and began his writing career with early support from Sir Walter Scott. Chambers’s vast output throughout his career as a writer can occasionally feel overwhelming. For example, Macfarlane observes that “in three years, he contributed to the Chambers’s Edinburgh Journal the following: 117 essays, and part of 44 others; 76 articles; 15 biographies; 4 tales; 3 poems” (332). That Chambers was able to produce [End Page 509] so much—especially given the challenges of managing a business, a large family, and regular bouts of poor health—is remarkable. Tracing Chambers’s career from humble beginnings to successful businessman provides the organizing structure for this biography. Macfar-lane’s study can best be divided into four parts. The first four chapters cover Chambers’s early family life and his struggles to establish himself in Edinburgh. Chapters 5–7 afford an overview of his history and folklore work, while chapters 8–10 offer insights into Chambers and the ways his interests in social reform informed his career as a publisher. The final four chapters survey the composition of Vestiges and later works, including a well-received biography of Robert Burns. Ultimately, through her detailed exploration of the phases of Chambers’s career, Macfarlane invites a reconsideration of this oft-neglected Scottish thinker, the circles in which he traveled, and his influence. Macfarlane’s treatment of the establishment of the Chambers’s Edinburgh Journal as “a family magazine for the middle classes” is a special highlight of the book (169). In each installment, there was something to appeal to every member of the home. Much of the attraction of the journal was due to its broad range of subject matter, featuring sundry “pieces on Geology, health, slavery and emigration, Malthus, old burgh laws, Mr Babbage’s machines, schools, capital punishment, Highland chiefs, Bentham, cricket, clever women, the seashore” and “beauty tips and advice on correct speech” (169). Besides entertainment, the mission of the journal was educational. Throughout his tenure as editor, Chambers ensured his readers knew about efforts to reform “terrible housing, child mortality, illiteracy, [and] long working hours” (172). He also used the periodical to spread awareness about working men’s institutes, improved infant care, and the importance of savings banks. The biography’s exploration of Chambers’s role in the development of evolutionary theory is also compelling. With the anonymous publication of Vestiges in 1844, Chambers synthesized his wide studies in geology into what Stephen Foster has described as “the first modern vision of nature as a unified, changing, and evolving system” in a work that predates The Origin of Species by fifteen years (Foster, “The Critical Response to Vestiges,” Victorian Web). Macfarlane observes that although Vestiges shocked audiences when it was first published, bringing the idea of evolution into the mainstream consciousness, “today its seductions are less obvious, and partly for the reason that its conclusions have long ceased to surprise” (252). Although controversial, Vestiges attracted a diverse readership on both sides of the Atlantic, quickly selling multiple editions. Highlights of Macfarlane’s chapters on Vestiges include further insight into Chambers’s revision and production processes, as well as the criticism [End Page 510] levelled against...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,334
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,991

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetDiverse Historical and Scientific StudiesTravaux en français237 207