An in-Depth Study of How Zinc Metal Surface Morphology Determines Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Stability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In order to achieve the net-zero world initiative and combat the climate crisis, a global consensus of marching towards a sustainable energy structure has been built, where developing reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy storage devices, the medium of storing intermittent surplus electricity from clean and inexhaustible renewable energy sources, such as wind power and solar energy, and transferring to the smart electric grid system, is of great significance [1]. Besides lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), the two dominant technologies having been developed substantially in the energy storage industry, researchers started pioneering studies on multivalent-ion systems of Ca [2, 3], Mg [4], Al [5, 6], and Zn [7-9] with competitive advantages, especially the ones as non-flammable economic substitutes, to ease manufacturing burden and enrich practical solutions for widespread application scenarios [10]. Especially, zinc metal with benefits of aqueous compatibility, commensurate capacity (820 mAh/g), and crust abundance, a resurgence of rechargeable zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) is happening. This battery system with water-based electrolyte chemistries is born with eye-catching benefits of safety and affordability; Zn/MnO 2 with an improved energy density of 409 Wh/kg at 1.9 V is considered a promising candidate for grid-scale energy storage [11]. This revolutionary cheap and safe solution empowers the global energy structural transformation and enriches the public’s awareness of sustainable development. However, like most reactive metals, zinc exposed in the air naturally evolves a dense passivation layer of Zn 5 (CO 3 ) 2 (OH) 6 to discontinue the corrosion by oxygen and humidity, which, in batteries, can passivate the molecular dynamics at the interface between zinc and the electrolyte and demonstrate enormous electron transfer resistance due to the inferior conductivity [12]. Thus, wearing off this passivation layer is considered a facile approach to revitalize the frozen kinetics of zinc ions [13]. Exposing fresh zinc to the electrolyte is also conductive of forming a functional solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Studies present that ZnF 2 -rich SEI plays a pivotal role in elongating the cycling life of zinc symmetric cells by effectively screening zinc from electrolyte solvents and reducing their sequence of side reactions [14]. Additionally, a tactful change of zinc’s surface roughness before electrochemical operations should impact electron distribution, zinc nucleation and growth, and SEI formation. Especially, dendrites are often considered guilty of internal short-circuiting of batteries; similar to lithium, the far-end of zinc dendrites can become dead zinc, whose accumulation brings in issues of electrolyte depletion, anodic capacity loss, internal resistance growth, and cell polarization [15]. In this work, a simple method was developed to change the surface of Zn anode to create more nucleation sites with lowered energy barriers (nucleation over-potentials), thus alleviating their dendrite growth. The cycling programs for zinc symmetric cells are standardized by fixing either the depth of cycling (DOC) or the areal current density in accordance with the constant energy or constant power supply in full batteries. In order to enunciate the battery degradation mechanism and shed light on the gas emission problems, we operate a careful electrochemical analysis cooperated with the differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) technique. The preliminary data demonstrate an evident impact of initial zinc surface morphology on sequential zinc plating/stripping profiles and eventual lifespans at serial DOCs and current densities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».