MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4285683652 · doi:10.1353/acs.2022.0034

Weaving Hope: The Religious of Jesus and Mary in the United States, 1877-2017 by Janice Farnham

2022· article· en· W4285683652 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darra D. Mulderry

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Catholic Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIrishImmigrationSociologyHistoryLawReligious studiesPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Weaving Hope: The Religious of Jesus and Mary in the United States, 1877-2017 by Janice Farnham Darra D. Mulderry Weaving Hope: The Religious of Jesus and Mary in the United States, 1877–2017. By Janice Farnham. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2020. 398 pp. $42.00. With Weaving Hope: The Religious of Jesus and Mary in the United States, 1877–2017, Janice Farnham, RJM, has delivered a detailed, beautifully written, and comprehensive history of the congregation’s apostolic work in the United States. The congregation’s service in the United States commenced in 1877 when three sisters departed Quebec to staff a Catholic elementary school at Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes parish in Fall River, Massachusetts. At the time, most of the 30,000 workers then employed in the city’s booming textile mills were French-Canadian immigrants. The pastor and families of the parish, concerned that the U.S. church, dominated as it was by an Irish-American hierarchy and clergy, would rapidly strip their children of the French-Canadian [End Page 93] national spirit, religious customs, and language, welcomed the sisters with relief. Additional New England parishes made similar appeals for sisters, and by the turn of the century, the Religious of Jesus and Mary were staffing a host of Catholic schools in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. The initial flow of RJMs from Quebec into New England would be the first of three major migrations of the congregation’s sisters into the United States, each from a different geographical location. Farnham highlights that the Religious of Jesus and Mary, in contrast to the vast majority of other orders that expanded into the United States from just one national culture, “are one from many.” Although the congregation had originated in France in 1818 as a community of sisters dedicated to girls’ education, by the mid-nineteenth century the sisters had opened convents and schools in India, Spain, and Quebec, and a few decades later, in Mexico and Italy, too. The second flow of RJMs to America would be spearheaded in 1902 when a few sisters went directly from Rome to New York City in hopes of contributing to girls’ education in the American metropolis. In the absence of immediate teaching opportunities for francophone sisters, however, these RJMs pivoted into establishing and running a 140-bed residence for single working women of modest income (that would remain open until the 1960s, serving thousands of women). Simultaneously, RJMs fleeing government persecution in Mexico in the early twentieth century launched educational, catechetical, and residential ministries in Texas and Southern California. Farnham faced enormous research—and narrative—challenges in taking on this multicultural, multi-regional, and multi-lingual history, and meets those challenges masterfully with a narrative structure that might serve as a model for historians of other congregations. In the introductory pages she offers readers a brilliantly incisive summary of the history of the U.S. church from 1877 to the present; Farnham’s seasoned knowledge as a longtime professor of modern Catholicism is evident here. She follows that with a concise overview of the RJM leadership in the form of mini-biographies of the congregation’s mothers general. Having orientated her readers with those summary histories, Farnham turns to her main work of offering detailed narratives of each apostolic endeavor, offering subheadings for each, making this an excellent reference work as well as historical narrative. Farnham employs the metaphor of weaving throughout, likening the RJMs’ apostolic endeavors to the making of an intricate tapestry, “woven of many cultures,” and organizes the history in three periods: the late nineteenth century (“Framing a Loom”), the first half of the twentieth century (Creating Patterns”), and the 1960s onward (“Weaving Fresh Fabric”). Convent annals and the correspondence files of sister superiors [End Page 94] are her main sources, and Farnham includes the names—birth name and religious name—of every sister who served in every locality. No weaver goes unnamed. Readers already familiar with the history of women’s teaching congregations in the United States will recognize some of the dynamics. The RJMs, like most of the thousands of sisters who formed nearly 90 percent of the staff in Catholic schools...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,164

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican Catholic StudiesMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207