An unfractured line: an academic tale of self-reflective social movement learning in the Nova Scotia anti-fracking movement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction ‘My friends, we are unfractured. And thereby hangs a tale. It's a tale in which we all are – each one of us is – a starring character and a co-author. We are the maker of this story that has been shaped by our unceasing, unrelenting efforts – all of which mattered and made a difference.’ (Sandra Steingraber, New York State anti-fracking organiser, 22 January 2015) ‘Frack Off, Gasholes!’ screams a T-shirt in block letters. It is worn by an attendee at the third public consultation of the Nova Scotia Independent Review Panel on Hydraulic Fracturing, held in New Glasgow, Nova Scotia, Canada on 21 July 2014. The 11-member Nova Scotia Independent Review Panel on Hydraulic Fracturing was commissioned by the New Democratic (socialist) provincial government in Nova Scotia in August 2013 after it put in place a two-year moratorium on fracking in 2012. The review panel submitted its report in August 2014, and in November a legislated ban was brought in by the Liberal government that succeeded the New Democrats. Several of us who drove up from Antigonish, where St Francis Xavier University is located, are wearing T-shirts that we have just purchased in the lobby downstairs. Our shirts are less direct, more tongue-in-cheek. Mine says, ‘peas-full protest against fracking; protect local food from oil and gas drilling’. It has a drawing on it of peas on the march. With the exception of one vocal audience member, the room is full of anti-frackers – with T-shirts, buttons and signs opposing fracking on display. Still, even though we all oppose the process, people are in the room for different reasons. Some of these differences are clearly visible from the tone and approach of the T-shirts we wear, while others are less visible. For instance, there are several people in the room who would dispute that we are in Nova Scotia, instead insisting we are in Mi’kma’ki, the traditional territory of the Mi’kmaq First Nation – territory that was never ceded over the almost 300 years since the British and Mi’kmaq first signed a treaty. The Mi’kmaq are the main First Nation people in the Canadian Maritimes, with a traditional territory that encompasses all of Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, the majority of New Brunswick, the Gaspesie in Quebec and parts of Newfoundland, and in the US, the state of Maine.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».