MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4286809340 · doi:10.1353/soh.2022.0158

Southern Journey: The Migrations of the American South, 1790–2020 by Edward L. Ayers

2022· article· en· W4286809340 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Cassanello

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Southern History · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésState (computer science)PoliticsHistoryCasualArt historyPassionNarrativePublishingArtLawPolitical scienceLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Southern Journey: The Migrations of the American South, 1790–2020by Edward L. Ayers Robert Cassanello Southern Journey: The Migrations of the American South, 1790–2020. By Edward L. Ayers. Maps by Justin Madron and Nathaniel Ayers. Walter Lynwood Fleming Lectures in Southern History. ( Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2020. Pp. xiv, 153. $39.95, ISBN 978-0-8071-7301-5.) Edward L. Ayers has combined his passion for digital history methods and traditional hard copy publications in a book that examines migration patterns in the South throughout the entire history of the United States. The book, upon casual inspection, appears like a coffee-table book. It is oversized with a cloth binding and vivid color photos on almost every page. Ayers builds a grand narrative about the South as ever-changing due to migrations, which should once and for all put to rest W. J. Cash's Mind of the South(New York, 1941), which depicts the South as a geography and people that are unchanging and unchanged. Ayers's South is constantly on the move, and the people who inhabit it are responding to economic, environmental, social, and political push and pull factors. The endnotes catalog all the major works on migration as well as document a deep dive into minor works that might be only state or locally focused. Ayers provides a narrative text to accompany the numerous maps, graphs, and charts that are embedded on almost every page of the book. Scholars researching and publishing on migration and the South might not find anything new in the text. Although the maps reproduced here are stunning to look at, they tell only a limited story because each is based on one or two variables. For example, one map titled "White Population Change, 1980–1990," we are told, demonstrates the white abandonment of the rural South except for Florida and the upper South (p. 111). We have only one data point, that of race, to work with here; if we could also see age, we could understand that the migration to Florida might be partly an aged migration such as those tracked by William H. Frey or a snowbird migration from Canada and the Northeast as documented by Godefroy Desrosiers-Lauzon in Florida's Snowbirds: Spectacle, Mobility, and Community since 1945(Montreal, 2011). The Florida case probably was dominated by a much different demographic of people than those who moved to the upper South during the same decades. Ayers explains these differences in the text, at least regarding the Florida migration, but the map cannot visually tell that same story. The first map of the book is "Southern Soils and Rivers" (p. xi). The rest of the maps are clearly marked and have keys, but for some reason this first map does not. In this map we see different colors to represent different soils; however, what the different colors represent is left to the imagination and not explained. This was the one map I was not sure what to make of or how to interpret al.so, the inclusion of Native peoples in the South is a surprise addition; however, due to the lack of specifics and [End Page 596]accuracy in the original data, these maps are overgeneralized to represent the few Indigenous nations and tribes most familiar to nonacademics. The text does a better job of explaining how to think about Native peoples and migration, but the maps in these cases do not offer much to researchers; the only value might be to locate the secondary sources Ayers has drawn this material from for the text. This book is a valuable asset to anyone interested in migration in the South; it is an indispensable first step. At the end of the book there is a list of all the sites used to create those maps, so anyone can go to those digital sources and create follow-up maps with more specific or multiple variables to dig deeper and tell further stories of migrations in the South, at least as long as those websites are still around. Robert Cassanello University of Central Florida Copyright © 2022 The Southern Historical Association

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,301
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Southern HistoryMême sujetHistory of Science and MedicineTravaux en français237 207