The Co-evolution of the WordPress Platform and Its Plugins
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
One can extend the features of a software system by installing a set of additional components called plugins. WordPress, as a typical example of such plugin-based software ecosystems, is used by millions of websites and has a large number (i.e., 54,777) of available plugins. These plugin-based software ecosystems are different from traditional ecosystems (e.g., NPM dependencies) in the sense that there is high coupling between a platform and its plugins compared to traditional ecosystems for which components might not necessarily depend on each other (e.g., NPM libraries do not depend on a specific version of NPM or a specific version of a client software system). The high coupling between a plugin and its platform and other plugins causes incompatibility issues that occur during the co-evolution of a plugin and its platform as well as other plugins. In fact, incompatibility issues represent a major challenge when upgrading WordPress or its plugins. According to our study of the top 500 most-released WordPress plugins, we observe that incompatibility issues represent the third major cause for bad releases, which are rapidly (within the next 24 hours) fixed via urgent releases. Thirty-two percent of these incompatibilities are between a plugin and WordPress while 19% are between peer plugins. In this article, we study how plugins co-evolve with the underlying platform as well as other plugins, in an effort to understand the practices that are related support such co-evolution and reduce incompatibility issues. In particular, we investigate how plugins support the latest available versions of WordPress, as well as how plugins are related to each other, and how they co-evolve. We observe that a plugin’s support of new versions of WordPress with a large amount of code change is risky, as the releases that declare such support have a higher chance to be followed by an urgent release compared to ordinary releases. Although plugins support the latest WordPress version, plugin developers omit important changes such as deleting the use of removed WordPress APIs, which are removed a median of 873 days after the APIs have been removed from the source code of WordPress. Plugins introduce new releases that are made according to a median of five other plugins, which we refer to as peer-triggered releases. A median of 20% of the peer-triggered releases are urgent releases that fix problems in their previous releases. The most common goal of peer-triggered releases is the fixing of incompatibility issues that a plugin detects as late as after a median of 36 days since the last release of another plugin. Our work sheds light on the co-evolution of WordPress plugins with their platform as well as peer plugins in an effort to uncover the practices of plugin evolution, so WordPress can accordingly design approaches to avoid incompatibility issues.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle