$6.20 Billion Laboratory Automation Industry Outlook, 2024 - IMARCGroup.com
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The global laboratory automation market has experienced a moderate growth over the past several years. This can be attributed to the numerous government initiatives coupled with advancements in automated systems.\n\nThe latest report by IMARC Group, entitled “Laboratory Automation Market Report: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2019-2024”, finds that the global laboratory automation market share reached a value of US$ 4.55 Billion in 2018. Laboratory automation refers to the utilization of automated systems so as to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of scientific research in laboratories. These systems are generally an integration of robotics, computer hardware and software, conveyor systems, machine vision, etc. that aid in achieving standardized and real-time analysis as well as improving performance by eliminating human errors. Nowadays, the most advanced lab automation systems include immunoassay, hematology, hemostasis and chemistry testing along with pre- and post-analytical processing. On account of rising competition and demand for higher efficacy in both research and clinical labs, the demand for laboratory automation systems has increased in the recent years.\n\nRequest Free Sample Report: https://www.imarcgroup.com/laboratory-automation-market/requestsample\n\nGlobal Laboratory Automation Market Trends:\n\nAutomated laboratory software has improved the productivity of testing solutions, enabling the lab teams to view history and track sample details anywhere at any time. Apart from this, several manufacturers have designed automated systems and software to improve workflow with decreased costs per test, reduced turnaround time, fewer errors and increased testing capacity. Moreover, the development of bench-top and standalone automated systems has facilitated the introduction of automation in smaller labs. Further, the governments of various countries are taking initiatives to enhance their laboratory research, in turn, creating a huge demand for laboratory automation. For instance, Genomics Research and Development Initiative (GRDI) by the government of Canada utilizes automated laboratory systems to increase test speed and minimize cost inputs. Owing to these factors, the global laboratory automation system market is projected to reach a value of US$ 6.20 Billion by 2024, exhibiting a CAGR of around 5.4% during 2019-2024.\n\nGlobal Laboratory Automation Market Summary:\n\n\n\tOn the basis of type, the market has been segmented into modular automation and whole lab automation. Currently, modular automation is the most popular segment in the global laboratory automation market.\n\tBased on equipment and software type, the market has been segregated into automated clinical and drug discovery laboratory systems. Amongst these, automated clinical laboratory systems dominate the market, accounting for the largest market share.\n\tOn the basis of end-user, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies represent the biggest end-user segment in the global laboratory automation market. These companies are followed by hospitals and diagnostic laboratories, and research and academic institutes.\n\tRegion-wise, North America is the leading market, holding the majority of the global share. This can be accredited to the rising number of research laboratories in the region which require an efficient and cost-effective solution for sample analysis. Other major regions include Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa.\n\tThe global laboratory automation market has also been examined with some of the major players being Danaher, PerkinElmer, Tecan Group, Thermo Fisher, Abbott Diagnostics, Agilent Technologies, Aurora Biomed, Becton, Dickinson and Company, BioMérieux, Biotek Instruments, Brooks Automation, Cerner, Eppendorf, Hamilton Storage Technologies, Lab Vantage Solutions, Labware, Olympus, Qiagen, Roche Holding and Siemens Healthcare.\n\n\nBrowse Full Report with TOC & List of Figure: https://www.imarcgroup.com/laboratory-automation-market\n\nRelated Reports by IMARC Group\n\nGlobal Biometrics Technology Market Share | Industry Report 2019-2024\n\nAbout Us\n\nIMARC Group is a leading market research company that offers management strategy and market research worldwide. We partner with clients in all sectors and regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their businesses.\n\nIMARC’s information products include major market, scientific, economic and technological developments for business leaders in pharmaceutical, industrial, and high technology organizations. Market forecasts and industry analysis for biotechnology, advanced materials, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, travel and tourism, nanotechnology and novel processing methods are at the top of the company’s expertise.\n\nContact US\n\nIMARC Group\nEmail: Sales@imarcgroup.com\nTel No:(D) +91 120 433 0800 | www.imarcgroup.com\nAmericas:- +1 631 791 1145 | Africa and Europe :- +44-702-409-7331 | Asia: +91-120-433-0800, +91-120-433-0800\nLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/imarc-group\n\n
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,684 | 0,734 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».