MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4288455360 · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104080

Adherence and discontinuation rates in patients on Tecfidera™ (dimethyl fumarate): Long-term Canadian experience from the Biogen ONE™ support program

2022· article· en· W4288455360 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Mattea Tan Thompson, Devonshire Virginia, Belviso Nick, Gillen Melissa, Noella Engineer, Changyu Shen, Scott Reedie

Notice bibliographique

RevueMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesBiogen
Mots-clésDimethyl fumarateDiscontinuationMedicineTerm (time)Multiple sclerosisFamily medicinePediatricsInternal medicinePhysical therapyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tecfidera™ (dimethyl fumarate [DMF]; Biogen) is an oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) indicated in Canada for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Biogen ONE™, an ongoing Canadian support program, facilitates access to DMF for patients with MS and maintains a database for the purposes of service provision. These data were utilized to assess adherence, persistence, discontinuations, and other outcomes between 2013 and 2021. METHODS: This non-interventional, retrospective study examined real-world use of DMF prescribed to patients with MS in Canada who were enrolled in the program and received their first dose between April 1, 2013, and June 30, 2021. Follow-up visits and laboratory monitoring occurred based on local standards and per the Canadian product monograph. For adherence and persistence assessments, patients must have had DMF dispensed by specialty pharmacies. Data were collected at patient enrollment, program exit, and throughout the duration of the program. The primary objective was to assess treatment adherence rates to DMF. Secondary objectives included treatment persistence rates, reasons for discontinuation, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), and patient characteristics throughout the duration of the program. RESULTS: Overall, 12,608 DMF patients from the program were included between April 1, 2013, and June 30, 2021. At enrollment, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 40.6 (10.7) years and mean (SD) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.2 (1.4). DMF was initiated as first-line DMT in 48.8% of patients. Of patients assessed (n = 6,848), 90.4% were adherent to DMF (based on medication possession ratio [MPR] ≥ 80%). Adherence (mean MPR) was marginally greater in DMT-naïve than switch patients, and in younger (< 40 years) than older (≥ 40 years) patients (both p < 0.001). Overall persistence on DMF at 24 months was 57.0%. Greater proportions of DMT-naïve patients persisted on DMF versus switch patients at all time points assessed. Persistence rates were comparable between female and male patients for up to 24 months, and between younger (< 40 years) and older (≥ 40 years) patients for up to 36 months. Older patients were more likely to discontinue for reasons related to lymphocytes (≥ 40 years, 16.1% vs. < 40 years, 6.1%) while efficacy reasons were reported with greater frequency in younger patients (≥ 40 years, 10.5% vs. < 40 years, 16.0%). Discontinuations due to gastrointestinal and flushing events occurred most frequently during the first month of treatment and decreased thereafter. Mean ALC decreased during the first year on treatment and subsequently plateaued. Over successive years, changes were observed in characteristics of patients starting on DMF, including decreases in EDSS score, age, and time since diagnosis. The proportion of DMT-naïve patients increased over the years (2013-2014, 26%-27%; 2018-2021, 62%-67%). CONCLUSIONS: High adherence was found in patients on DMF treatment within the Biogen support program with access to specialty pharmacies. The evolution of the patient population throughout the years suggests a shift towards earlier treatment. These real-world data may support the value of a support program in optimizing the management of patients on DMF treatment. Support programs provide personalized treatment monitoring, which can help minimize early discontinuations and improve adherence to treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,140
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,944

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMultiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersMême sujetMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207