Risk of future cardiovascular diseases in different years postpartum after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on the optimal timing and frequency of postpartum follow-up visits after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) for primary prevention and early detection of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in high-risk women. We aimed to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular outcomes later in life in women with prior HDP in different years postpartum and in preeclamptic women with severe features, or early onset of preeclampsia. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus without language restriction for relevant articles published from inception to March 16, 2022. We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies assessing hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, venous thromboembolism, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, dementia, composite cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular diseases, and mortality after 6 weeks postpartum, in women with prior HDP compared with controls. Two authors independently selected and appraised the studies. Article quality was independently assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effect models were used for meta-analysis. Stratified analyses based on years postpartum, severity, and onset of preeclampsia were performed. RESULTS: We included 59 studies for qualitative review, of which 56 were included in quantitative meta-analysis, involving 1,262,726 women with prior HDP and 14,711,054 controls. Women with prior HDP had increased risks of hypertension (relative risk [RR] 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67-4.49), ischemic heart disease (RR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.38-3.08), and heart failure (RR 2.53, 95% CI: 1.28-5.00) later in life, compared with those with normotensive pregnancies. The risk of hypertension was highest during 5 years postpartum (RR 5.34, 95% CI: 2.74-10.39). Compared with normotensive pregnancies, the risk of future CVDs significantly increased in preeclamptic women. DISCUSSION: A history of HDP is associated with approximately 2- to 4-fold increase in the risk of CVDs. Screening for CVDs and their risk factors in women with prior HDP since delivery, especially the first 5 years after delivery is suggested for early detection and appropriate management. Evidence on the risks of CVDs in preeclampsia with severe features and early onset of preeclampsia is limited due to having few studies and high heterogeneity. FUNDING: The Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program-RGJ (PHD/0183/2561); Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) Research Career Development Grant-RSA (RSA6180009); Targeted Research Grants Program of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. REGISTRATION: CRD42020191550.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,022 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».