Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Physicians and other health care providers are among the most trusted people in the world. They take on enormous responsibility and have enormous power — often seen as heroes by their patients and their families. With that power and privilege come opportunities for abuse of the same — from compassionately writing excessive prescriptions to sexual violations. The vast majority of physicians are responsible practitioners and upstanding citizens, but as highlighted by the article Preventing Egregious Ethical Violations in Medical Practice (page 23), there is a sub-segment of physicians who abuse their power and harm others in the process. Recommendations for preventing such ethical violations and, when that is not possible, identifying and remediating/reprimanding individuals who commit them early will decrease the incidence and severity/duration of such violations when they occur…Medical regulators and those they regulate are constantly in a sort of tug of war: Those who are regulated want to get credentialed via simpler and faster processes and get to work, while the regulators who oversee them are charged with verifying their training, qualifications and backgrounds in order to protect the public. As noted in the article State-by-State Variations in PA Licensure: A Policy Analysis (page 14), there is great variation in how physician assistants are licensed. In part, this variability may exist because regulations regarding this new specialty were being developed simultaneously in many jurisdictions... Narcotics, benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-like drugs/Z-drugs in excess and dangerous combinations are the scourge of Canadian and American medical practice. Opioids, Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs: Alberta Physicians' Attitudes and Opinions upon Receipt of their Personalized Prescribing Profile (page 8) describes how a Canadian prescription drug monitoring system generates individual physician profiles and sends them to each physician. The responses by the physicians to a follow-up survey varied from gratitude and intent to optimize prescribing practices to frustration and confusion. There were requests for more information and for specialty-specific educational activities. These three articles remind us that as we charge into a new year in hot pursuit of protecting the public, once again we are challenged to optimize the way we initially license practitioners, the way we keep them in the loop regarding best practices, and most importantly, how we quickly identify and remediate or reprimand those who stray from ethical practices.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle