The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880–1950 ed. by Elke D’hoker and Chris Mourant
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880–1950 ed. by Elke D’hoker and Chris Mourant Leslee Thorne-Murphy (bio) Elke D’hoker and Chris Mourant, eds., The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880–1950 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021), pp. vii + 338, $120/£90 hardcover, e-book. In keeping with its excellent offerings in the field of periodical studies, Edinburgh University Press has published a new volume examining short fiction within the realm of magazine culture. The editors, Elke D’hoker and Chris Mourant, assert that the interplay between the genre of the short story and the development of periodical publication “reveals a functional system of discourse in which generic conventions are moulded in interaction with reader expectations, magazine policies and authorial intentions” (5). As the editors note, the fourteen essays presented in the volume are best understood as case studies exploring these variables. Each essayist focuses on a particular journal or subset of journals, exploring how the periodicals and the short fiction published within them were mutually informing and positing how this interaction shapes our understanding of the short story genre and its larger historical context. [End Page 655] Given its emphasis on the role of periodical publication in shaping the short story genre, this collection of essays will be of particular interest to readers of Victorian Periodicals Review. The volume joins recent work by scholars who gesture toward this approach, such as Emma Liggins, Andrew Maunder, and Ruth Robbins in The British Short Story (2011), as well as Dean Baldwin, Winnie Chan, Ann-Marie Einhaus, Barbara Korte, and Tim Killick in their contributions to the study of short fiction. The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880–1950 adds to this conversation by placing the interaction between short stories and periodical publication at center stage, bringing to bear the expertise of both established and upcoming scholars. The collection is organized in roughly chronological order. The first three chapters address publications from the years 1880 to 1900. In the first chapter, Whitney Standlee asserts that, as editor of Atalanta, L. T. Meade selected narratives that interrogated and re-envisioned gendered roles and that stylistically these narratives pointed toward the “short complete story” favored by many modernists (27). These themes continue in Elke D’hoker’s chapter, which engages with the stylistic innovations of the short story sequence. D’hoker determines that the episodic nature of the genre, as shaped by the rhythms of periodical publishing, allowed Annie S. Swan to evade the confines of the marriage plot in her stories published in the Woman at Home. David Malcolm’s essay also addresses periodical context, emphasizing the importance of reading short fiction within the Albermarle alongside other material published in each issue. He notes the “codicological” ironies of “abrasive” and sometimes radical fiction appearing alongside news stories and advertisements aimed at a readership that was presumably well educated and entitled (83). The next two chapters explore iconic periodicals from the early twentieth century, the English Review and Rhythm. Annalise Grice offers a thoughtful and perceptive examination of the role D. H. Lawrence’s short fiction played in the English Review, specifically addressing his ability to depict working-class life. Short fiction had an important role to play in Rhythm as well, Louise Edensor argues. She discusses representative examples of short fiction in the journal, asserting that they have been unduly overlooked and were integral to John Middleton Murry’s editorial vision. Continuing to the interwar years, Emma West examines artist stories in the Royal and the Strand during the early 1920s. West’s excellent analysis both traces the ways in which the stories helped to shape each periodical’s identity and acknowledges that “magazines are heterogeneous, messy spaces, with short stories as likely to subvert the title’s values as to uncritically regurgitate them” (146). Similar “messy spaces” are integral to Alice Wood’s study of short stories by women in Eve. She discusses the means [End Page 656] these authors used to explore modern, though not necessarily modernist, notions of gender roles. Yui Kajita turns from an emphasis on human life to examine two stories depicting parrots, both published in the London Mercury. Kajita...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».